Suppr超能文献

控制在农村道路风险感知中的作用。

The role of control in risk perception on rural roads.

机构信息

Transport Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Transport Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105573. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105573. Epub 2020 May 6.

Abstract

Risk perception plays an important role in driver behaviour, particularly for speed choice. Risk perception studies use a range of techniques from on-road data collection to ratings of still photos, however participants' ratings differ depending on the study methodology, possibly due to their perception of control. To explore this we conducted a multiple methods study to investigate drivers' perceptions of risk on rural roads. One group of participants drove (Drivers, n = 13) a 180 km route along rural roads (accompanied by a research assistant) and provided verbal risk ratings at thirteen locations of interest. A second group (Passengers, n = 10) provided ratings at the same points when travelling as a passenger in a vehicle (driven by a research assistant). The third group (Observers, n = 14) were shown videos of the same rural roads (filmed from the drivers' perspective) and also provided risk ratings at the same locations. A week later participants were invited to the laboratory to review the video footage and comment on factors that contributed to the risk ratings. Overall, the Observers gave the highest risk ratings and Drivers the lowest. The Observers also provided twice the number of comments to justify their risk rating compared to the other two groups. The results suggest that control, and on-road experience play a significant role in how perceptions of driving risk are formed and the degree of risk experienced. These findings also bring into question the accuracy of using video-based tasks to assess drivers' risk perception (and speed choice), particularly if the findings are used to inform on-road safety interventions.

摘要

风险感知在驾驶行为中起着重要作用,特别是对速度选择的影响。风险感知研究使用了从道路数据收集到静态照片评分等一系列技术,但由于参与者对控制感的不同,他们的评分可能因研究方法而异。为了探讨这一点,我们进行了一项多方法研究,以调查驾驶员在农村道路上的风险感知。一组参与者(驾驶员,n=13)沿着农村道路行驶 180 公里(由一名研究助理陪同),在 13 个感兴趣的地点提供口头风险评分。第二组(乘客,n=10)在作为乘客乘车时(由一名研究助理驾驶)在相同地点提供评分。第三组(观察者,n=14)观看了相同农村道路的视频(从驾驶员的角度拍摄),并在相同地点提供风险评分。一周后,参与者被邀请到实验室查看视频片段,并对导致风险评分的因素发表评论。总体而言,观察者给出的风险评分最高,驾驶员给出的评分最低。观察者提供的评论数量也比其他两组多一倍,以证明其风险评分的合理性。结果表明,控制感和道路经验在驾驶风险感知的形成方式和体验风险的程度方面起着重要作用。这些发现也对使用基于视频的任务评估驾驶员的风险感知(和速度选择)的准确性提出了质疑,特别是如果这些发现被用于告知道路安全干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验