Suppr超能文献

经导管精索内静脉栓塞术与腹腔镜高位结扎术治疗左侧精索静脉曲张的对比分析

Analysis of internal spermatic vein embolization through catheter versus laparoscopic high ligation in treatment of left varicocele.

作者信息

Jing Ye-Xiang, Wang Rui-Hua, Liu Zhao-Xuan, Meng Qing-Yi

机构信息

Department of Graduate School, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Vascular. 2020 Oct;28(5):583-590. doi: 10.1177/1708538120923548. Epub 2020 May 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Varicocele is a common disease in young and middle-aged men. This study aims to compare the efficacy of internal spermatic vein embolization of left varicocele versus laparoscopic high ligation.

METHODS

From January 2017 to September 2018, a total of 69 varicocele patients were admitted and given the opportunity to choose the treatment option. Among these, 26 patients were treated with sclerosing agent injection, while 43 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. They were followed up for 12 months after surgery, and the technical success rate, recurrence rate, complication rate, cost, operative time, and hospitalization time with regard to these two methods were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients completed the medical procedures. There was no recurrence in patients in the sclerotherapy group during the follow-up period; however, the complication rate was 19.2%. Furthermore, the operative time, hospitalization time, and cost of treatment were 31.1 ± 11.1 min, 1.2 ± 0.49 days, and 9613.11 ± 895.97 Yuan, respectively. In the laparoscopic group, 9 patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral high ligation, while 34 patients received treatment on the left side alone. The recurrence rate of left varicocele was 4.7% and the complication rate was 44.2%. Furthermore, the operative time, hospitalization time, and treatment cost were 50.4 ± 14.48 min, 4.0 ± 2.02 days, and 10,948.29 ± 2547.00 Yuan, respectively. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (<0.05) in operative time, hospitalization time, and treatment cost. Patients in the sclerotherapy group had an advantage with respect to the overall complication rate when compared with patients from the laparoscopic group ( = 4.448, <0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in hydrocele ( = 4.555, <0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between these two groups ( = 1.245, >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent sclerotherapy showed a higher technical success rate, a lower recurrence rate, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization time compared to those treated with laparoscopic ligation. Transcatheter sclerosing agent injection may be a preferable treatment option for patients with unilateral varicocele.

摘要

目的

精索静脉曲张是中青年男性的常见疾病。本研究旨在比较左侧精索静脉曲张的精索内静脉栓塞术与腹腔镜高位结扎术的疗效。

方法

2017年1月至2018年9月,共收治69例精索静脉曲张患者,并给予他们选择治疗方案的机会。其中,26例患者接受硬化剂注射治疗,43例患者接受腹腔镜手术。术后对他们进行12个月的随访,分析这两种方法的技术成功率、复发率、并发症发生率、费用、手术时间和住院时间。

结果

所有患者均完成医疗程序。硬化治疗组患者在随访期间无复发;然而,并发症发生率为19.2%。此外,手术时间、住院时间和治疗费用分别为31.1±11.1分钟、1.2±0.49天和9613.11±895.97元。在腹腔镜组中,9例患者接受了腹腔镜双侧高位结扎,34例患者仅接受左侧治疗。左侧精索静脉曲张的复发率为4.7%,并发症发生率为44.2%。此外,手术时间、住院时间和治疗费用分别为50.4±14.48分钟、4.0±2.02天和10948.29±2547.00元。而且,手术时间、住院时间和治疗费用存在统计学显著差异(<0.05)。与腹腔镜组患者相比,硬化治疗组患者在总体并发症发生率方面具有优势(χ²=4.448,<0.05),在鞘膜积液方面存在统计学显著差异(χ²=4.555,<0.05)。然而,两组之间的复发率无显著差异(χ²=1.245,>0.05)。

结论

与接受腹腔镜结扎术的患者相比,接受硬化治疗的患者技术成功率更高、复发率更低、并发症更少且住院时间更短。经导管硬化剂注射可能是单侧精索静脉曲张患者的首选治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验