1Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469C Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 259772 Singapore.
2Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, USA.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 May 6;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00147-2. eCollection 2020.
It is imperative that researchers studying medical tourism connect their work with policy, so that its real-world challenges can be better understood, and more effectively addressed. This article gauges the scope and evolution of in medical tourism research through a bibliometric review of published academic literature, to establish the extent to which researchers apply public policy theories and frameworks in their investigation of medical tourism, or consider the policy imperatives of their work.
A Boolean search of the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was performed to identify policy-related publications on medical tourism. We analyzed the results using bibliometrics and a data visualization software called to identify patterns in knowledge production and underlying network linkages in policy research on the subject.
Our findings suggest that only a small proportion of medical tourism research explicitly addresses policy issues or applies policy paradigms in their study approach. Field-specialized journals serving practitioners publish less research as compared to interdisciplinary social and health policy journals. Moreover, there are significant geographical and disciplinary disparities in the policy-orientation of research, and a predilection towards select policy areas such as reproductive and transplant tourism to the neglect of more holistic governance and health system considerations.
This article is a call to action for greater engagement by policy scholars on medical tourism, and for health researchers to more explicitly consider how their research might contribute to the understanding and resolution of contemporary policy challenges of medical tourism. Failure to clearly and consistently make the policy connection is a lost opportunity for researchers to frame the public debate, and influence policy thinking on medical tourism.
研究医疗旅游的研究人员必须将其工作与政策联系起来,以便更好地了解其现实世界的挑战,并更有效地应对这些挑战。本文通过对已发表学术文献的文献计量学回顾,评估了医疗旅游研究中 的范围和演变,以确定研究人员在调查医疗旅游时应用公共政策理论和框架的程度,或者考虑其工作的政策必要性。
通过 Web of Science (WoS) 核心合集进行布尔搜索,以确定与医疗旅游相关的政策出版物。我们使用文献计量学和名为 的数据可视化软件对结果进行分析,以识别该主题政策研究中知识生产的模式和潜在的网络联系。
我们的研究结果表明,只有一小部分医疗旅游研究明确解决政策问题或在其研究方法中应用政策范例。与跨学科社会和健康政策期刊相比,为从业者服务的领域专业期刊发表的研究较少。此外,政策导向研究在地理和学科上存在显著差异,并且倾向于选择特定的政策领域,如生殖和移植旅游,而忽略了更全面的治理和卫生系统考虑。
本文呼吁政策学者更多地参与医疗旅游研究,并呼吁卫生研究人员更明确地考虑他们的研究如何有助于理解和解决医疗旅游的当代政策挑战。未能明确和一致地建立政策联系是研究人员构建公共辩论和影响医疗旅游政策思维的错失机会。