Pham Giang, Ebert Kerry Danahy
School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, CA.
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1521-1536. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00366. Epub 2020 May 13.
Purpose Sentence repetition and nonword repetition assess different aspects of the linguistic system, but both have been proposed as potential tools to identify children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Cross-linguistic investigation of diagnostic tools for DLD contributes to an understanding of the core features of the disorder. This study evaluated the effectiveness of these tools for the Vietnamese language. Method A total of 104 kindergartners (aged 5;2-6;2 [years;months]) living in Vietnam participated, of which 94 were classified as typically developing and 10 with DLD. Vietnamese sentence repetition and nonword repetition tasks were administered and scored using multiple scoring systems. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated to assess the ability of these tasks to identify DLD. Results All scoring systems on both tasks achieved adequate to excellent sensitivity or specificity, but not both. Binary scoring of sentence repetition achieved a perfect negative likelihood ratio, and binary scoring of nonword repetition approached a highly informative positive likelihood ratio. More detailed scoring systems for both tasks achieved moderately informative values for both negative and positive likelihood ratios. Conclusions Both sentence repetition and nonword repetition are valuable tools for identifying DLD in monolingual speakers of Vietnamese. Scoring systems that consider number of errors and are relatively simple (i.e., error scoring of sentence repetition and syllables scoring of nonword repetition) may be the most efficient and effective for identifying DLD. Further work to develop and refine these tasks can contribute to cross-linguistic knowledge of DLD as well as to clinical practice.
目的 句子重复和非词重复评估语言系统的不同方面,但二者均被提议作为识别发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童的潜在工具。对DLD诊断工具进行跨语言调查有助于理解该障碍的核心特征。本研究评估了这些工具在越南语中的有效性。 方法 共有104名居住在越南的幼儿园儿童(年龄在5岁2个月至6岁2个月之间)参与,其中94名被归类为发育正常,10名患有DLD。使用多种评分系统对越南语句子重复和非词重复任务进行施测和评分。计算敏感性、特异性和似然比以评估这些任务识别DLD的能力。 结果 两项任务的所有评分系统均达到了足够至优秀的敏感性或特异性,但并非两者兼具。句子重复的二元评分获得了完美的阴性似然比,非词重复的二元评分接近高信息量的阳性似然比。两项任务更详细的评分系统在阴性和阳性似然比方面均获得了中等信息量的值。 结论 句子重复和非词重复都是识别越南语单语者中DLD的有价值工具。考虑错误数量且相对简单的评分系统(即句子重复的错误评分和非词重复的音节评分)可能是识别DLD最有效率和效果的方法。进一步开展开发和完善这些任务的工作有助于丰富DLD的跨语言知识以及临床实践。