Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 14.
An early report of recipient heart transplantation outcomes under the new U.S. heart allocation system introduced in late 2018 found a lower post-transplant survival rate compared with that of the prior system.
The aim of this study was to examine recipient survival under the new system by using an updated dataset.
The 2015 to 2019 United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adult heart transplant recipients, stratified according to whether the subjects were listed and underwent transplant before or after October 18, 2018, when the new allocation system was implemented. The association between allocation system and recipient mortality was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
A total of 7,119 recipients met inclusion criteria: 6,004 (84%) and 1,115 (16%) listed and undergoing transplant in the old and new allocation systems, respectively. This registry update included 576 new-system recipients, more than double the amount previously analyzed. Recipients from the new system were more likely to be bridged to transplant with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices instead of durable left ventricular assist devices and had longer graft ischemic times. After adjustment, the new system was not associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank test; p = 0.075) or multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.55).
The short-term survival of recipients listed and receiving a transplant under the old and new allocation systems seems to be comparable. The modification to the allocation system has resulted in several changes to the clinical profiles of patients undergoing transplants that must be closely monitored in the coming years.
2018 年末美国推出了新的心脏分配系统,一项关于该系统下受体心脏移植结果的早期报告显示,与之前的系统相比,移植后的存活率较低。
本研究旨在使用更新的数据集来检查新系统下受体的生存情况。
2015 年至 2019 年,通过美国器官共享网络注册处查询成年心脏移植受者,根据他们是否在 2018 年 10 月 18 日(新分配系统实施)之前或之后被列入名单并接受移植进行分层。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析分配系统与受体死亡率之间的关系。
共有 7119 名受者符合纳入标准:6004 名(84%)和 1115 名(16%)分别在旧分配系统和新分配系统中被列入名单并接受移植。此注册更新包括 576 名新系统受者,是之前分析数量的两倍多。新系统的受者更有可能使用临时机械循环支持设备桥接到移植,而不是使用耐用的左心室辅助设备,并且移植的移植物缺血时间更长。调整后,新系统与 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析(对数秩检验;p=0.075)或多变量 Cox 比例风险模型(调整后的危险比:1.18;95%置信区间:0.90 至 1.55)均无较差的生存相关性。
根据旧和新分配系统进行登记和接受移植的受者的短期生存率似乎相当。分配系统的修改导致接受移植的患者的临床特征发生了一些变化,在未来几年必须密切监测这些变化。