Suppr超能文献

重新评估新心脏分配系统下的受者死亡率:UNOS 登记分析的更新。

Reassessing Recipient Mortality Under the New Heart Allocation System: An Updated UNOS Registry Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An early report of recipient heart transplantation outcomes under the new U.S. heart allocation system introduced in late 2018 found a lower post-transplant survival rate compared with that of the prior system.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine recipient survival under the new system by using an updated dataset.

METHODS

The 2015 to 2019 United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adult heart transplant recipients, stratified according to whether the subjects were listed and underwent transplant before or after October 18, 2018, when the new allocation system was implemented. The association between allocation system and recipient mortality was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 7,119 recipients met inclusion criteria: 6,004 (84%) and 1,115 (16%) listed and undergoing transplant in the old and new allocation systems, respectively. This registry update included 576 new-system recipients, more than double the amount previously analyzed. Recipients from the new system were more likely to be bridged to transplant with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices instead of durable left ventricular assist devices and had longer graft ischemic times. After adjustment, the new system was not associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank test; p = 0.075) or multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term survival of recipients listed and receiving a transplant under the old and new allocation systems seems to be comparable. The modification to the allocation system has resulted in several changes to the clinical profiles of patients undergoing transplants that must be closely monitored in the coming years.

摘要

背景

2018 年末美国推出了新的心脏分配系统,一项关于该系统下受体心脏移植结果的早期报告显示,与之前的系统相比,移植后的存活率较低。

目的

本研究旨在使用更新的数据集来检查新系统下受体的生存情况。

方法

2015 年至 2019 年,通过美国器官共享网络注册处查询成年心脏移植受者,根据他们是否在 2018 年 10 月 18 日(新分配系统实施)之前或之后被列入名单并接受移植进行分层。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析分配系统与受体死亡率之间的关系。

结果

共有 7119 名受者符合纳入标准:6004 名(84%)和 1115 名(16%)分别在旧分配系统和新分配系统中被列入名单并接受移植。此注册更新包括 576 名新系统受者,是之前分析数量的两倍多。新系统的受者更有可能使用临时机械循环支持设备桥接到移植,而不是使用耐用的左心室辅助设备,并且移植的移植物缺血时间更长。调整后,新系统与 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析(对数秩检验;p=0.075)或多变量 Cox 比例风险模型(调整后的危险比:1.18;95%置信区间:0.90 至 1.55)均无较差的生存相关性。

结论

根据旧和新分配系统进行登记和接受移植的受者的短期生存率似乎相当。分配系统的修改导致接受移植的患者的临床特征发生了一些变化,在未来几年必须密切监测这些变化。

相似文献

1
Reassessing Recipient Mortality Under the New Heart Allocation System: An Updated UNOS Registry Analysis.
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):159-167. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4909.
4
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
5
Survival on the Heart Transplant Waiting List.
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1227-1235. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2795.
6
Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Under the New Heart Allocation System: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007966. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007966. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Does Lung Donation by Heart Donors Have an Impact on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients?
Am J Transplant. 2017 Feb;17(2):506-511. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13981. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Does recipient work status pre-transplant affect post-heart transplant survival? A United Network for Organ Sharing database review.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 May;37(5):604-610. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.01.1307. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Heart Transplantation: An In-Depth Survival Analysis.
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):557-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Dual Procurement of Lung and Heart Allografts Does Not Negatively Affect Lung Transplant Outcomes.
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

2
The effect of donor distance on post-transplant mortality in the modern era.
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 10;25:241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.019. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Differences in wait-list mortality: Temporary vs durable circulatory support devices.
JHLT Open. 2025 Jun 2;9:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100312. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Insights into the history and tendency of cardiac transplantation for heart failure: A bibliometric-based visual analysis.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 May 1;59:101691. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101691. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
BTT-ECMO Trends and Outcomes Under Revised Heart Allocation System.
JHLT Open. 2024 Nov 28;7:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100180. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Use of mechanical circulatory support and survival for heart and heart-kidney transplant recipients in the new allocation system.
JHLT Open. 2024 Feb 15;4:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100071. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Survival trends in heart transplant patients supported on ECMO and IABP: A 10-year UNOS database analysis.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 13;54:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101486. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Bridging Over Troubled Waters-How the United States 2018 Heart Allocation System Altered Transplant Bridging Strategies.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 20;25(2):68. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502068. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Is it too early to investigate survival outcomes of the new US heart allocation system?
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jul;39(7):726. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.1343. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
The new tiered allocation system for heart transplantation in the United States-a Faustian bargain.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Aug;38(8):870-871. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Post-transplant outcome in patients bridged to transplant with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Aug;38(8):858-869. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
5
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a direct bridge to heart transplantation in adults.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1607-1618.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.152. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
7
Changes in United States heart allocation: A community energized to improve policy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;152(6):1484-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
Major advantages and critical challenge for the proposed United States heart allocation system.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 May;35(5):547-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
Report from a forum on US heart allocation policy.
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):55-63. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13033.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验