Borrelli Eric P, Lee Erica Y, Caffrey Aisling R
Ment Health Clin. 2020 May 7;10(3):70-75. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2020.05.070. eCollection 2020 May.
In October 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) instituted an update to the mandatory Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program for clozapine to improve safety monitoring of hematologic events. However, the impact of the clozapine REMS program on reporting of hematologic adverse events has not been quantified.
We assessed adverse event reports for agranulocytosis, granulocytopenia, leukopenia, and neutropenia from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for a 1-year time period before (October 2014 to September 2015, pre-REMS) and after (October 2015 to September 2016, post-REMS) the implementation of the clozapine REMS program. The AERSMine platform was used to capture historical effect estimates (October 2004 to September 2014). Reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), and corresponding Taylor series 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for hematologic events with clozapine compared with all other medications using OpenEpi.
Reporting rates for agranulocytosis, granulocytopenia, leukopenia, and neutropenia with clozapine all increased from the pre-REMS to post-REMS time frames, ranging from a 2-fold increase with leukopenia to a 40-fold increase with neutropenia; the composite measure of all hematologic reports had a 12-fold increase. During the post-REMS time frame, the ROR increased by 1691% (111.4, 95% CI 100.6-123.4) compared with the pre-REMS time frame (7.1, 95% CI 5.2-9.6), and the PRR increased by 1280% (83.1, 95% CI 76.8-90.0 vs 6.9, 95% CI 5.1-9.4) for the composite outcome.
We observed significant increases in reports of hematologic adverse events with clozapine after the introduction of the clozapine REMS program. Future research should explore the impact of the less stringent exclusionary and discontinuation criteria on utilization (eg, expanded access) and clinical outcomes (eg, treatment effectiveness and adverse events).
2015年10月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对氯氮平的强制性风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)计划进行了更新,以加强对血液学事件的安全监测。然而,氯氮平REMS计划对血液学不良事件报告的影响尚未得到量化。
我们评估了FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中粒细胞缺乏症、粒细胞减少症、白细胞减少症和中性粒细胞减少症的不良事件报告,时间跨度为氯氮平REMS计划实施前1年(2014年10月至2015年9月,REMS前)和实施后1年(2015年10月至2016年9月,REMS后)。使用AERSMine平台获取历史效应估计值(2004年10月至2014年9月)。使用OpenEpi计算氯氮平与所有其他药物相比的血液学事件的报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比值比(PRR)以及相应的泰勒级数95%置信区间(CI)。
氯氮平导致的粒细胞缺乏症、粒细胞减少症、白细胞减少症和中性粒细胞减少症的报告率从REMS前到REMS后均有所增加,白细胞减少症增加了2倍,中性粒细胞减少症增加了40倍;所有血液学报告的综合指标增加了12倍。在REMS后时间段内,与REMS前时间段相比,ROR增加了1691%(111.4,95%CI 100.6 - 123.4),而REMS前为7.1,95%CI 5.2 - 9.6;综合结果的PRR增加了1280%(83.1,95%CI 76.8 - 90.0,而REMS前为6.9,95%CI 5.1 - 9.4)。
我们观察到引入氯氮平REMS计划后,氯氮平导致的血液学不良事件报告显著增加。未来的研究应探讨不太严格的排除和停药标准对药物使用(如扩大可及性)和临床结果(如治疗效果和不良事件)的影响。