Morey Leslie C, Good Evan W, Hopwood Christopher J
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
J Pers. 2022 Feb;90(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12560. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders distinguishes core personality dysfunction common to all personality pathology from maladaptive traits that delineate specific variants of disorder. Previous research shows the convergence between maladaptive and normal range trait domains as well as substantial correlations between maladaptive traits and core dysfunctions, leading some to conclude that personality traits and dysfunction are redundant. This study sought to examine the potential utility of the concept of core dysfunctions as a means of clarifying the nature of the relationship between maladaptive and normal-range traits.
Three nonclinical samples (n = 178, 307, and 1,008) were evaluated for personality dysfunction, maladaptive traits, and normal-range traits using different measures.
Results indicated that: (1) normal trait domains and core dysfunction contribute independently to understanding maladaptive traits; (2) the correlation of a normal trait domain with its putative maladaptive equivalent is consistently accounted for in part by core dysfunction; and (3) the multitrait multimethod matrices of normal and maladaptive personality trait domains demonstrate appreciable discriminant validity problems that are clarified by a consideration of core dysfunction.
These results suggest that maladaptive traits reflect the distinguishable contributions of core personality dysfunction (problems) and normal-range personality traits (person).
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型将所有人格病理学共有的核心人格功能障碍与描绘特定障碍变体的适应不良特质区分开来。先前的研究表明适应不良特质与正常范围特质领域之间存在趋同,以及适应不良特质与核心功能障碍之间存在显著相关性,这使得一些人得出结论,认为人格特质和功能障碍是多余的。本研究旨在检验核心功能障碍概念作为一种澄清适应不良特质与正常范围特质之间关系本质的手段的潜在效用。
使用不同的测量方法对三个非临床样本(n = 178、307和1008)进行人格功能障碍、适应不良特质和正常范围特质的评估。
结果表明:(1)正常特质领域和核心功能障碍对理解适应不良特质有独立贡献;(2)正常特质领域与其假定的适应不良对应物之间的相关性部分地始终由核心功能障碍来解释;(3)正常和适应不良人格特质领域的多特质多方法矩阵显示出明显的区分效度问题,而通过考虑核心功能障碍得以澄清。
这些结果表明,适应不良特质反映了核心人格功能障碍(问题)和正常范围人格特质(个体)的可区分贡献。