Suppr超能文献

估计方法对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。

The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.

作者信息

Shi Dexin, Maydeu-Olivares Alberto

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):421-445. doi: 10.1177/0013164419885164. Epub 2019 Nov 10.

Abstract

We examined the effect of estimation methods, maximum likelihood (ML), unweighted least squares (ULS), and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS), on three population SEM (structural equation modeling) fit indices: the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). We considered different types and levels of misspecification in factor analysis models: misspecified dimensionality, omitting cross-loadings, and ignoring residual correlations. Estimation methods had substantial impacts on the RMSEA and CFI so that different cutoff values need to be employed for different estimators. In contrast, SRMR is robust to the method used to estimate the model parameters. The same criterion can be applied at the population level when using the SRMR to evaluate model fit, regardless of the choice of estimation method.

摘要

我们研究了估计方法,即最大似然法(ML)、未加权最小二乘法(ULS)和对角加权最小二乘法(DWLS),对三个人口结构方程模型(SEM)拟合指数的影响:近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和标准化均方根残差(SRMR)。我们考虑了因子分析模型中不同类型和水平的模型误设:维度误设、遗漏交叉负荷以及忽略残差相关性。估计方法对RMSEA和CFI有重大影响,因此不同的估计器需要采用不同的临界值。相比之下,SRMR对用于估计模型参数的方法具有稳健性。在使用SRMR评估模型拟合时,无论估计方法如何选择,在总体水平上都可以应用相同的标准。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):421-445. doi: 10.1177/0013164419885164. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):731-755. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1480346. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):179-207. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Mar-Jun;51(2-3):220-39. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
7
Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Fake Perturbation of Ordinal Data: A Sample by Replacement Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Jul;47(4):519-46. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.692616.
8
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian nursing students' learning self-efficacy instrument.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331435. eCollection 2025.
2
NSSI contagion in adolescent friendships: exploring the impact of peer influence.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Aug 18;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00946-w.
3
Psychometric models of emerging adulthood: an evaluation in a Chilean university sample.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1483934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1483934. eCollection 2025.
4
Diabetes as a predictor of COVID-19 preventive behaviors.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1496183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1496183. eCollection 2025.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Abuse Short Form (ACE-ASF) for Ecuadorian Youth.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Apr 16;15(4):63. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040063.
6
Probing beyond: The impact of model size and prior informativeness on Bayesian SEM fit indices.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 5;57(4):108. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02609-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):676-694. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
3
The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):731-755. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1480346. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):419-429. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
The Thorny Relation Between Measurement Quality and Fit Index Cutoffs in Latent Variable Models.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jan-Feb;100(1):43-52. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models.
Psychometrika. 2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7.
8
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
9
2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Jan 1;38(1):113-39. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_5.
10
An Investigation of the Sample Performance of Two Nonnormality Corrections for RMSEA.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Nov;47(6):904-30. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715252.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验