Blomaard Laura C, Mooijaart Simon P, Bolt Shanti, Lucke Jacinta A, de Gelder Jelle, Booijen Anja M, Gussekloo Jacobijn, de Groot Bas
Department of Internal Medicine, section Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Institute of Evidence-Based Medicine in Old Age | IEMO, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):1034-1041. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa078.
risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care.
to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the 'Acutely Presenting Older Patient' (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation.
2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center.
all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years.
feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses.
we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72-82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01-1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39-0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47-0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related ('patient was too sick'), organisation-related ('ED was too busy') and personnel-related ('forgot to complete screening').
with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.
急诊科老年患者的风险分层工具在常规护理中很少成功实施。
评估“急性就诊老年患者”(APOP)筛查工具的可行性和可接受性,该工具可在就诊2分钟内识别出不良结局风险最高的急诊科老年患者。
在莱顿大学医学中心急诊科常规护理中实施APOP筛查工具后进行的为期2个月的前瞻性队列研究。
所有年龄≥70岁的连续急诊科患者。
通过测量筛查率以及识别与患者和机构相关的筛查完成决定因素来评估筛查的可行性。通过收集分诊护士在筛查完成过程中遇到的障碍来评估可接受性。
我们纳入了953例患者,中位年龄为77岁(四分位间距72 - 82岁),其中560例(59%)患者接受了筛查。年龄较大的患者接受筛查的可能性更高(比值比1.03(95%置信区间1.01 - 1.06),P = 0.017)。分诊为非常紧急时(比值比0.55(0.39 - 0.78),P = 0.001)或到达时患者数量较多时(比值比0.63(0.47 - 0.86),P = 0.003),患者接受筛查的可能性较低。筛查完成过程中遇到的障碍包括与患者相关的(“患者病情太重”)、与机构相关的(“急诊科太忙”)和与人员相关的(“忘记完成筛查”)。
超过一半的老年患者接受了筛查,急诊科常规护理中筛查的可行性和可接受性很有前景。为了进一步提高筛查完成率,需要针对紧急就诊患者和急诊科高峰时段的患者找到解决方案。