Brookes Jack, Mushtaq Faisal, Jamieson Earle, Fath Aaron J, Bingham Geoffrey, Culmer Peter, Wilkie Richard M, Mon-Williams Mark
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2020 May 20;15(5):e0224055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224055. eCollection 2020.
Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such 'active inference' is driven by 'surprise'. We used these insights to create a formal model that explains why disturbance might help learning. In two experiments, participants undertook a continuous tracking task where they learned how to move their arm in different directions through a novel 3D force field. We compared baseline performance before and after exposure to the novel field to quantify learning. In Experiment 1, the exposure phases (but not the baseline measures) were delivered under three different conditions: (i) robot haptic assistance; (ii) no guidance; (iii) robot haptic disturbance. The disturbance group showed the best learning as our model predicted. Experiment 2 further tested our FEP inspired model. Assistive and/or disturbance forces were applied as a function of performance (low surprise), and compared to a random error manipulation (high surprise). The random group showed the most improvement as predicted by the model. Thus, motor learning can be conceptualised as a process of entropy reduction. Short term motor strategies (e.g. global impedance) can mitigate unexpected perturbations, but continuous movements require active inference about external force-fields in order to create accurate internal models of the external world (motor learning). Our findings reconcile research on the relationship between noise, variability, and motor learning, and show that information is the currency of motor learning.
干扰力有助于运动学习,但对于这一违反直觉的现象缺乏理论解释。平稳的手臂运动需要对与工作空间相关的力场进行预测(推理)。自由能原理(FEP)表明,这种“主动推理”是由“意外”驱动的。我们利用这些见解创建了一个形式模型,以解释为什么干扰可能有助于学习。在两个实验中,参与者进行了一项连续跟踪任务,他们学习如何通过一个新颖的三维力场在不同方向移动手臂。我们比较了接触新力场前后的基线表现,以量化学习情况。在实验1中,暴露阶段(但不是基线测量)在三种不同条件下进行:(i)机器人触觉辅助;(ii)无引导;(iii)机器人触觉干扰。正如我们的模型所预测的,干扰组表现出最佳的学习效果。实验2进一步测试了我们受FEP启发的模型。根据表现(低意外)施加辅助力和/或干扰力,并与随机误差操作(高意外)进行比较。正如模型所预测的,随机组表现出最大的进步。因此,运动学习可以被概念化为一个熵减少的过程。短期运动策略(例如全局阻抗)可以减轻意外扰动,但连续运动需要对外部力场进行主动推理,以便创建准确的外部世界内部模型(运动学习)。我们的研究结果调和了关于噪声、变异性和运动学习之间关系的研究,并表明信息是运动学习的关键因素。