Yu Jiangping, E Mingju, Sun Wei, Liang Wei, Wang Haitao, Møller Anders Pape
Jilin Engineering Laboratory for Avian Ecology and Conservation Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Curr Zool. 2020 Jun;66(3):247-253. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoz049. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Hole-nesting tits spp. have been classified as "unsuitable" hosts for cuckoo parasitism because cuckoos cannot enter a cavity if the entrance is too small. However, Chinese tits could reject alien eggs and egg ejection rate increased with the local diversity of parasitic cuckoo species. Antiparasitic behavior among Chinese tits may have evolved due to greater size variation among sympatric cuckoo species. This raises the question of whether differently sized parasitic cuckoos pose different threats to Chinese tits. A green-backed tit population that is sympatric with Asian emerald cuckoo (eme-cuckoo, small-sized parasite) and common cuckoo (com-cuckoo, large-sized parasite), and a cinereous tit population that is only sympatric with com-cuckoo were chosen as study organisms. We observed behavioral response and recorded alarm calls of the 2 tit species to eme-cuckoo, com-cuckoo, chipmunk (a nest predator) and dove (a harmless control), and subsequently played back alarm calls to conspecific incubating females. In dummy experiments, both tit species performed intense response behavior to chipmunk, but rarely responded strongly to the 3 avian species. In playback experiments, both tit species responded strongly to conspecific chipmunk alarm calls, but rarely responded to dove alarm calls. The intensity of response of incubating female green-backed tits to eme-cuckoo and com-cuckoo alarm calls were similar to that of chipmunk alarm calls, while the intensity to eme-cuckoo alarm calls was higher than the intensity to dove alarm calls which was similar to that of com-cuckoo alarm calls. In contrast, few female cinereous tits responded to eme-cuckoo and com-cuckoo alarm calls. These findings indicated that the threat level of eme-cuckoo was slightly greater than that of com-cuckoo for sympatric green-backed tits, but not for allopatric cinereous tits.
树洞营巢的山雀类被归类为杜鹃寄生的“不合适”宿主,因为如果入口太小,杜鹃无法进入树洞。然而,中华山雀能够拒绝外来卵,并且随着当地寄生杜鹃种类的多样性增加,卵的排斥率也会上升。中华山雀的抗寄生行为可能是由于同域分布的杜鹃种类之间体型差异更大而进化而来的。这就引出了一个问题,即不同大小的寄生杜鹃对中华山雀是否构成不同的威胁。选择了一个与亚洲翠杜鹃(小翠鹃,小型寄生虫)和普通杜鹃(大杜鹃,大型寄生虫)同域分布的绿背山雀种群,以及一个仅与大杜鹃同域分布的灰蓝山雀种群作为研究对象。我们观察了这两种山雀对小翠鹃、大杜鹃、花鼠(一种巢捕食者)和鸽子(一种无害对照)的行为反应并记录了它们的警报叫声,随后向同种正在孵卵的雌鸟回放警报叫声。在模拟实验中,两种山雀对花鼠都表现出强烈的反应行为,但对这三种鸟类很少有强烈反应。在回放实验中,两种山雀对同种花鼠的警报叫声反应强烈,但对鸽子的警报叫声很少有反应。正在孵卵的绿背山雀雌鸟对小翠鹃和大杜鹃警报叫声的反应强度与对花鼠警报叫声的反应强度相似,而对小翠鹃警报叫声的反应强度高于对鸽子警报叫声的反应强度,后者与对大杜鹃警报叫声的反应强度相似。相比之下,很少有灰蓝山雀雌鸟对小翠鹃和大杜鹃的警报叫声做出反应。这些发现表明,对于同域分布的绿背山雀来说,小翠鹃的威胁水平略高于大杜鹃,但对于异域分布的灰蓝山雀则并非如此。