Lee Ki Hwa, Lee Soo Jee, Park Jae Hong, Kim Se Hun, Lee Hyunseong, Oh Dae Seok, Kim Yong Han, Park Yei Heum, Kim Hyojoong, Lee Sang Eun
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Haeundaegu, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020001.
Elderly patients with femoral fractures are anticipated to endure the most pain caused by positional changes required for spinal anesthesia. To improve pain relief, we compared the analgesic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine-ketamine and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations to facilitate patient positioning for spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to two groups and received either 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine (group K) or 1 μg/kg of intravenous fentanyl (group F) concomitant with a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, then dexmedetomidine infusion only was continued at 0.6 μg/kg/h for following 20 minutes, and titrated at a rate of 0.2 to 0.6 μg/kg/h until the end of surgery. After completion of the infusion of either ketamine or fentanyl, the patients were placed in the lateral position with the fracture site up. The pain score (0 = calm, 1 = facial grimacing, 2 = moaning, 3 = screaming, and 4 = unable to proceed because of restlessness or agitation) was used to describe the pain intensity in each step during the procedure (lateral positioning, hip flexion, and lumbar puncture), and quality score (0 = poor hip flexion, 1 = satisfactory hip flexion, 2 = good hip flexion, and 3 = optimal hip flexion) was used to describe the quality of posture. Group K showed a median pain score of 0 (0-1), 0 (0-0) and 0 (0-0) in lateral positioning, hip flexion and lumbar puncture, respectively, while group F showed a score of 3 (2.75-3), 3 (2-3) and 0 (0-1), respectively. The pain score in lateral positioning (P < .0001) and hip flexion (P < .0001) was significantly lower in group K than group F. Group K showed the significantly higher quality scores of spinal anesthesia positioning (P = .0044) than group F. Hemodynamic adverse effects, such as bradycardia, hypotension, and desaturation, were not significantly different between the groups. The administration of dexmedetomidine-ketamine showed a greater advantage in reducing pain intensity and increasing the quality with patient positioning during spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures, without any serious adverse effects.
预计老年股骨骨折患者在脊髓麻醉所需的体位改变时会承受最大程度的疼痛。为了改善疼痛缓解情况,我们比较了静脉注射右美托咪定-氯胺酮和右美托咪定-芬太尼组合在促进老年股骨近端骨折患者脊髓麻醉时体位摆放方面的镇痛效果。46例患者被随机分为两组,分别静脉注射1mg/kg氯胺酮(K组)或1μg/kg芬太尼(F组),同时在10分钟内静脉注射负荷剂量的右美托咪定1μg/kg,随后仅继续以0.6μg/kg/h的速度静脉输注右美托咪定20分钟,并以0.2至0.6μg/kg/h的速度滴定直至手术结束。在输注氯胺酮或芬太尼后,将患者置于骨折部位朝上的侧卧位。疼痛评分(0 = 平静,1 = 面部 grimacing,2 = 呻吟,3 = 尖叫,4 = 因烦躁或激动无法进行)用于描述操作过程中每个步骤(侧卧位摆放、髋关节屈曲和腰椎穿刺)的疼痛强度,体位质量评分(0 = 髋关节屈曲不佳,1 = 髋关节屈曲满意,2 = 髋关节屈曲良好,3 = 髋关节屈曲最佳)用于描述体位质量。K组在侧卧位摆放、髋关节屈曲和腰椎穿刺时的疼痛评分中位数分别为0(0-1)、0(0-0)和0(0-0),而F组分别为3(2.75-3)、3(2-3)和0(0-1)。K组在侧卧位摆放(P <.0001)和髋关节屈曲(P <.0001)时的疼痛评分显著低于F组。K组脊髓麻醉体位的质量评分显著高于F组(P = 0.0044)。两组间心动过缓、低血压和低氧血症等血流动力学不良反应无显著差异。在老年股骨近端骨折患者脊髓麻醉期间,静脉注射右美托咪定-氯胺酮在减轻疼痛强度和提高体位质量方面具有更大优势,且无任何严重不良反应。