F.T Stone Laboratory and Ohio Sea Grant, the Ohio State University, OH 43456, USA.
F.T Stone Laboratory and Ohio Sea Grant, the Ohio State University, OH 43456, USA; Division of Natural Science, Applied Science, and Mathematics, Defiance College, Defiance OH, F.T Stone Laboratory, The Ohio State University and Ohio Sea Grant, OH 43456, USA.
J Environ Sci (China). 2020 Jul;93:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
Water quality sondes have the advantage of containing multiple sensors, extended deployment times, high temporal resolution, and telecommunication with stakeholder accessible data portals. However, sondes that are part of buoy deployments often suffer from typically being fixed at one depth. Because water treatment plants are interested in water quality at a depth of the water intake and other stakeholders (ex. boaters and swimmers) are interested in the surface, we examined whether a fixed depth of approximately 1 m could cause over- or under-estimation of cyanobacterial biomass. We sampled the vertical distribution of cyanobacteria adjacent to a water quality sonde buoy in the western basin of Lake Erie during the summers of 2015-2017. A comparison of buoy cyanobacteria RFU (Relative Fluorescence Unit) at 1 m to cyanobacteria chlorophyll a (chla) measured throughout the water column showed occurrences when the buoy both under and overestimated the cyanobacteria chla at specific depths. Largest differences between buoy measurements and at-depth grab samples occurred during low wind speeds (< 4.5 m/sec) because low winds allowed cyanobacteria to accumulate at the surface above the buoy's sonde. Higher wind speeds (> 4.5 m/sec) resulted in better agreement between the buoy and at-depth measurements. Averaging wind speeds 12 hr before sample collection decreased the difference between the buoy and at-depth samples for high wind speeds but not low speeds. We suggest that sondes should be placed at a depth of interest for the appropriate stakeholder group or deploy sondes with the ability to sample at various depths.
水质探头的优势在于包含多个传感器、可延长部署时间、具有高时间分辨率,并且可与利益相关者的数据门户进行远程通信。然而,作为浮标部署一部分的探头通常存在一个缺点,即通常固定在一个深度。因为水处理厂对取水口深度的水质感兴趣,而其他利益相关者(例如划船者和游泳者)则对水面感兴趣,所以我们研究了固定在大约 1 米的深度是否会导致蓝藻生物量的高估或低估。我们在 2015-2017 年的夏季,在伊利湖西部盆地的水质探头浮标附近,对蓝藻进行了垂直分布采样。将浮标 1 米处的蓝藻 RFU(相对荧光单位)与整个水柱中的蓝藻叶绿素 a(chl a)进行比较,结果表明在特定深度,浮标既低估又高估了蓝藻 chla 的情况时有发生。在风速较低(<4.5 m/sec)时,浮标测量值与深度采集样本之间的差异最大,因为低风速会导致蓝藻在浮标探头上方的水面积聚。较高的风速(>4.5 m/sec)会导致浮标和深度测量之间的一致性更好。在采样前 12 小时平均风速会降低高风速时浮标与深度样本之间的差异,但对低风速没有影响。因此,我们建议根据利益相关者的需求,将探头放置在适当的深度,或者部署能够在不同深度进行采样的探头。