Suppr超能文献

双向格林手术与半Fontan手术的比较:单心室重建试验公共使用数据集分析

A Comparison of Bidirectional Glenn vs. Hemi-Fontan Procedure: An Analysis of the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Use Dataset.

作者信息

Edelson Jonathan B, Ravishankar Chitra, Griffis Heather, Zhang Xuemei, Faerber Jennifer, Gardner Monique M, Naim Maryam Y, Macsio Christopher E, Glatz Andrew C, Goldberg David J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Suite 8NW90, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Healthcare Analytics Unit, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Aug;41(6):1166-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02371-6. Epub 2020 May 29.

Abstract

Patients with single ventricle (SV) heart defects have two primary surgical options for superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC): bidirectional Glenn (BDG) and hemi-Fontan (HF). Outcomes based on type of SCPC have not been assessed in a multi-center cohort. This retrospective cohort study uses the Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) Trial public use dataset. Infants who survived to SCPC were evaluated through 1 year of age, based on type of SCPC. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival at 1 year. The cohort included 343 patients undergoing SCPC across 15 centers in North America; 250 (73%) underwent the BDG. There was no difference between the groups in pre-SCPC clinical characteristics. Cardiopulmonary bypass times were longer [99 min (IQR 76, 126) vs 81 min (IQR 59, 116), p < 0.001] and use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) more prevalent (51% vs 19%, p < 0.001) with HF. Patients who underwent HF had a higher likelihood of experiencing more than one post-operative complication (54% vs 41%, p = 0.05). There were no other differences including the rate of post-operative interventional cardiac catheterizations, length of stay, or survival at discharge, and there was no difference in transplant-free survival out to 1 year of age. Mortality after SCPC is low and there is no difference in mortality at 1 year of age based on type of SCPC. Differences in support time and post-operative complications support the preferential use of the BDG, but additional longitudinal follow-up is necessary to understand whether these differences have implications for long-term outcomes.

摘要

单心室(SV)心脏缺陷患者在进行上腔静脉-肺动脉连接(SCPC)时有两种主要手术选择:双向格林分流术(BDG)和半Fontan手术(HF)。基于SCPC类型的治疗结果尚未在多中心队列中进行评估。这项回顾性队列研究使用了单心室重建(SVR)试验的公共使用数据集。对存活至SCPC阶段的婴儿,根据SCPC类型进行1岁前的评估。主要结局是1岁时无移植生存。该队列包括北美15个中心的343例接受SCPC的患者;250例(73%)接受了BDG手术。两组在SCPC术前临床特征方面无差异。心肺转流时间更长[99分钟(四分位间距76,126)对81分钟(四分位间距59,116),p<0.001],且HF组更普遍使用深低温停循环(DHCA)(51%对19%,p<0.001)。接受HF手术的患者发生一种以上术后并发症的可能性更高(54%对41%,p=0.05)。在术后介入性心导管检查率、住院时间或出院生存率等其他方面无差异,且1岁时无移植生存率也无差异。SCPC术后死亡率较低,基于SCPC类型的1岁时死亡率无差异。支持时间和术后并发症的差异支持优先使用BDG,但需要额外的长期随访来了解这些差异是否对长期结局有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验