Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children Health, No.56 Nanlishi Road, Beijing, 100045, China.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01021-y.
Continuous reference intervals (RIs) allow for more precise consideration of the dynamic changes of physiological development, which can provide new strategies for the presentation of laboratory test results. Our study aimed to establish continuous RIs using four different simulation methods so that the applicability of different methods could be further understood.
The data of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and serum creatinine (Cr) were obtained from the Pediatric Reference Interval in China study (PRINCE), in which healthy children aged 0-19 years were recruited. The improved non-parametric method, the radial smoothing method, the General Additive Model for Location Scale and Shape (GAMLSS), and Lambda-Median-Sigma (LMS) were used to develop continuous RIs. The accuracy and goodness of fit of the continuous RIs were evaluated based on the out of range (OOR) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) results.
Samples from 11,517 and 11,544 participants were used to estimate the continuous RIs of ALP and Cr, respectively. Time frames were partitioned to fulfill the following two criteria: sample size = 120 in each subgroup and mean difference = 2 between adjacent time frames. Cubic spline or penalized spline was used for curve smoothing. The RIs estimated by the four methods approximately overlapped. However, more obvious edge effects were shown in the curves fit by the non-parametric methods than the semi-parametric method, which may be attributed to insufficient sample size. The OOR values of all four methods were smaller than 10%.
All four methods could be used to establish continuous RIs. GAMLSS and LMS are more reliable than the other two methods for dealing with edge effects.
连续参考区间(RI)允许更精确地考虑生理发育的动态变化,这可为实验室检验结果的呈现提供新策略。我们的研究旨在使用四种不同的模拟方法建立连续 RI,以便进一步了解不同方法的适用性。
碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和血清肌酐(Cr)的数据来自中国儿童参考区间研究(PRINCE),该研究招募了 0-19 岁的健康儿童。采用改进的非参数方法、径向平滑方法、位置尺度和形状的广义加性模型(GAMLSS)和Lambda-Median-Sigma(LMS)来建立连续 RI。根据超出范围(OOR)和赤池信息量准则(AIC)结果评估连续 RI 的准确性和拟合优度。
分别使用 11517 名和 11544 名参与者的样本来估计 ALP 和 Cr 的连续 RI。时间框架分为满足以下两个标准的部分:每个子组中的样本量=120,相邻时间框架之间的平均差异=2。使用三次样条或惩罚样条进行曲线平滑。四种方法估计的 RI 大致重叠。然而,与半参数方法相比,非参数方法拟合的曲线显示出更明显的边缘效应,这可能归因于样本量不足。所有四种方法的 OOR 值均小于 10%。
所有四种方法均可用于建立连续 RI。GAMLSS 和 LMS 比其他两种方法更可靠,可用于处理边缘效应。