Vanderbilt School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Vanderbilt School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
Lymphedema associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) therapy causes adverse clinical outcomes. Standard treatment includes professionally administered complete decongestive therapy (CDT). Cost and availability of trained therapists are known barriers to therapy. Advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCD) may address these issues. A randomized, wait-list controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate an APCD in post-treatment HNC patients with lymphedema.
Eligible patients had completed treatment for HNC, were disease free, and had lymphedema at enrollment. Participants were randomized to wait-list lymphedema self-management (standard of care) or lymphedema self-management plus the use of the APCD bid. Safety (CTCAE V4.0) and feasibility were primary endpoints; secondary endpoints included efficacy measure by objective examination and patient reported outcomes (symptoms, quality of life, function), adherence barriers, and satisfaction. Assessments were conducted at baseline and weeks 4 and 8.
Forty-nine patients were enrolled (wait-list n = 25; intervention n = 24). In total, forty-three patients completed the study. No device-related Serious Adverse Events were reported. Most patients used the APCD once per day, instead of the prescribed twice per day, citing time related factors as barriers to use. APCD use was associated with significant improvement in perceived ability to control lymphedema (p = 0.003) and visible external swelling (front view p < 0.001, right view p = 0.004, left p = 0.005), as well as less reported pain.
This trial supports the safety and feasibility of the APCD for the treatment of secondary lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients. In addition, preliminary data supports efficacy.
头颈部癌症(HNC)治疗相关的淋巴水肿会导致不良的临床结局。标准治疗包括专业的完整消肿治疗(CDT)。治疗师的成本和可用性是治疗的已知障碍。先进的气动压缩设备(APCD)可能会解决这些问题。一项随机、等待名单对照试验旨在评估治疗后 HNC 患者淋巴水肿的 APCD。
符合条件的患者已完成 HNC 治疗,无疾病,且在入组时患有淋巴水肿。参与者被随机分配到等待名单淋巴水肿自我管理(标准护理)或淋巴水肿自我管理加 APCD 每日两次使用。安全性(CTCAE V4.0)和可行性是主要终点;次要终点包括客观检查和患者报告的结局(症状、生活质量、功能)、依从性障碍和满意度的疗效测量。评估在基线和第 4 周和第 8 周进行。
共纳入 49 例患者(等待名单 n=25;干预 n=24)。总共有 43 例患者完成了研究。未报告与设备相关的严重不良事件。大多数患者每天使用 APCD 一次,而不是规定的每天两次,原因是与时间相关的因素是使用的障碍。APCD 的使用与感知控制淋巴水肿的能力显著提高(p=0.003)和可见的外部肿胀(正面视图 p<0.001,右侧视图 p=0.004,左侧 p=0.005),以及疼痛减轻有关。
这项试验支持 APCD 治疗头颈部癌症患者继发性淋巴水肿的安全性和可行性。此外,初步数据支持疗效。