Sink Joshua, Blatt Stephen, Yoo David, Henry Michael, Yang S Daniel, Vasaiwala Roshni, Ghadiali Larissa, Adams William, Bouchard Charles S
Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, USA.
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Apr;28(3):197-202. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20926819. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
In this study, we compared the assessment of remote smartphone photographs to in-office exams in the diagnosis of two groups of external eye diseases, red-eye pathology and post-operative eyelid surgery complications. Participants were examined and received an in-office diagnosis by either a corneal or oculoplastic specialist. After viewing an educational video on smartphone photography, the patient's companion then took a series of standardized photographs. Two additional corresponding specialists then made a separate diagnosis via the interpretation of only smartphone images and the patient's history. 'Remote' and in-office diagnoses were compared using a kappa test for agreement. The remote and in-office diagnoses were in agreement for 27 of 28 eyes, representing a chance-corrected Kappa agreement rate of 93% (95% confidence interval: 79-99%). Among the 16 red eyes, the diagnoses were in agreement for 15 of 16 red eyes, representing a chance-corrected Kappa agreement rate of 92% (95% confidence interval: 77-99%). Among the 12 eyes with post-operative eyelid surgery complications, the diagnoses were in perfect agreement. Our results suggest that the diagnosis of 1) red-eye pathology and 2) post-operative eyelid surgery complications based on smartphone images may be comparable to in-office exams.
在本研究中,我们比较了通过远程智能手机照片与门诊检查对两组外眼疾病(红眼病变和眼睑手术后并发症)的诊断情况。参与者接受了角膜或眼整形专科医生的检查及门诊诊断。在观看了一段关于智能手机摄影的教学视频后,患者的陪同人员随后拍摄了一系列标准化照片。另外两名相应的专科医生随后仅通过解读智能手机图像和患者病史做出了单独诊断。使用kappa一致性检验比较“远程”诊断和门诊诊断。28只眼中有27只眼的远程诊断和门诊诊断一致,校正机遇后的Kappa一致性率为93%(95%置信区间:79 - 99%)。在16只红眼病例中,16只眼中有15只眼的诊断一致,校正机遇后的Kappa一致性率为92%(95%置信区间:77 - 99%)。在12只出现眼睑手术后并发症的眼中,诊断完全一致。我们的结果表明,基于智能手机图像对1)红眼病变和2)眼睑手术后并发症的诊断可能与门诊检查相当。