Lambert Bradley S, Miller Katherine E, Delgado Domenica A, Chaliki Kalyan, Lee Joshua, Bauza Guillermo, Taraballi Francesca, Dong David, Tasciotti Ennio, Harris Joshua D, McCulloch Patrick C
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 May 1;13(3):802-817. doi: 10.70252/AKMZ9424. eCollection 2020.
Performing yoga in a heated environment (HY) is a popular exercise mode purported to improve range of motion (ROM), body composition, and aerobic fitness. The purpose of this investigation was to compare a session of HY to room temperature yoga (RTY) with regards to ROM, oxygen consumption, caloric expenditure, and biomarkers of acute stress and inflammation. Sixteen experienced yoga practitioners (F14, M2; 40 ± 11yr; 22.6 ± 1.8 kg/m) completed a 1-hour standardized Bikram sequence in HY (105°F, 40°C) and RTY (74°F, 23.3°C) conditions (order of conditions randomized, humidity standardized at 40%). Intra-exercise metabolic gas exchange and heart rate (HR) was monitored using a metabolic cart. ROM measures were taken pre and post-exercise at the elbow, shoulder, hip, and knee. Cytokines interleukin 6,10 (IL-6, IL-10) and tumor-necrosis-factor alpha (TNF-α) were analyzed from blood samples collected pre- and 30-minutes post-exercise. Intra-exercise metabolic gas exchange and heart rate (HR) was monitored using a metabolic cart. Both bouts elicited similar acute changes in ROM although HY elicited a greater increase in hip abduction (RTYΔ° = 2.3 ± 1.3|HYΔ° = 6.6 ± 1.5; < 0.05). Mean VO, peak VO, %VOmax, HR, and kcal expenditure did not differ between conditions. RER was lower during the HY (RTY = 0.95 ± 0.02| HY = 0.89 ± 0.02; < 0.05) with a concomitant elevation in fat oxidation (RTY = 0.05 ± 0.01|HY = 0.09 ± 0.01, g·min; < 0.05) and decrease in carbohydrate oxidation (RTY = 0.51 ± 0.04|HY = 0.44 ± 0.03, g·min; < 0.05). Serum IL-6 was increased (15.5 ± 8.0-fold) following HY only ( < 0.05). HY does not significantly elevate aerobic energy cost compared to RTY but may acutely increase fat substrate utilization and hip ROM. Future studies remain needed to establish dose-response relationships for including HY or RTY into well-rounded fitness programs.
在高温环境(HY)下进行瑜伽是一种流行的运动方式,据称可以改善关节活动范围(ROM)、身体成分和有氧适能。本研究的目的是比较一次高温瑜伽与室温瑜伽(RTY)在ROM、耗氧量、热量消耗以及急性应激和炎症生物标志物方面的差异。16名经验丰富的瑜伽练习者(女性14名,男性2名;年龄40±11岁;体重指数22.6±1.8kg/m²)在高温(105°F,40°C)和室温(74°F,23.3°C)条件下完成了1小时的标准化比克拉姆序列瑜伽练习(条件顺序随机,湿度标准化为40%)。运动过程中使用代谢车监测代谢气体交换和心率(HR)。在运动前和运动后测量肘部、肩部、髋部和膝部的ROM。从运动前和运动后30分钟采集的血样中分析细胞因子白细胞介素6、10(IL-6、IL-10)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。运动过程中使用代谢车监测代谢气体交换和心率(HR)。尽管高温瑜伽组髋外展增加幅度更大(室温瑜伽组Δ°=2.3±1.3|高温瑜伽组Δ°=6.6±1.5;P<0.05),但两组运动引起的ROM急性变化相似。不同条件下的平均VO₂、峰值VO₂、%VO₂max、HR和千卡消耗无差异。高温瑜伽组的呼吸交换率较低(室温瑜伽组=0.95±0.02|高温瑜伽组=0.89±0.02;P<0.05),同时脂肪氧化增加(室温瑜伽组=0.05±0.01|高温瑜伽组=0.09±0.01,g·min;P<0.05),碳水化合物氧化减少(室温瑜伽组=0.51±0.04|高温瑜伽组=0.44±0.03,g·min;P<0.05)。仅高温瑜伽组运动后血清IL-6升高(1 / 5.5±8.0倍)(P<0.05)。与室温瑜伽相比,高温瑜伽不会显著提高有氧能量消耗,但可能会急性增加脂肪底物利用和髋部ROM。未来仍需要研究以确定将高温瑜伽或室温瑜伽纳入全面健身计划的剂量反应关系。