School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia; School of Lifesciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Victoria, Australia.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;35(10):874-885. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Studies suggest that many species are already living close to their upper physiological thermal limits. Phenotypic plasticity is thought to be an important mechanism for species to counter rapid environmental change, yet the extent to which plastic responses may buffer projected climate change - and what limits the evolution of plasticity - is still unclear. The tolerance-plasticity trade-off hypothesis predicts that the evolution of plasticity may be constrained by a species' thermal tolerance. Empirical evidence is equivocal, but we argue that inconsistent patterns likely reflect problems in experimental design/analysis, limiting our ability to detect and interpret trade-off patterns. Here, we address why we may, or may not see tolerance-plasticity trade-offs and outline a framework addressing current limitations, focusing on understanding the underlying mechanisms.
研究表明,许多物种已经接近其生理热极限。表型可塑性被认为是物种应对快速环境变化的重要机制,但可塑性反应在多大程度上可以缓冲预计的气候变化,以及可塑性进化的限制因素尚不清楚。耐受性-可塑性权衡假说预测,可塑性的进化可能受到物种热耐受性的限制。经验证据是模棱两可的,但我们认为,不一致的模式可能反映了实验设计/分析中的问题,限制了我们检测和解释权衡模式的能力。在这里,我们探讨了为什么我们可能会看到或看不到耐受性-可塑性权衡,以及概述了一个解决当前限制的框架,重点是理解潜在的机制。