Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Glob Public Health. 2020 Aug;15(8):1093-1102. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1779331. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
In seeking to limit the number of new infections of COVID-19, governments around the world have implemented national lockdowns and guidelines about safe behaviours. Lockdown requires people to stay home and only leave when essential such as to purchase groceries and medication. In low- and middle-income countries, many of which have large proportions of the population living in precarity, lockdown forces millions of people to spend prolonged periods of time together in close proximity to one another and with limited resources. In many ways, efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 in densely populated communities with limited access to food, water and sanitation may seem counter-intuitive and even impossible under conditions of precarity. In this paper, we explore the barriers to implementation of lockdown rules in conditions of precarity. We conceptualise the structural barriers by drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework to explain how these barriers influence adherence to lockdown rules. We argue that without sufficient support or intervention to help poor communities mitigate these structural barriers, adhering to lockdown rules is difficult, resulting in continued COVID-19 infections.
在努力限制 COVID-19 的新感染人数方面,世界各地的政府都实施了全国性的封锁和安全行为准则。封锁要求人们待在家里,只有在必要时才离开,例如购买食品杂货和药品。在中低收入国家,其中许多国家有很大比例的人口生活在不稳定的环境中,封锁迫使数百万人在彼此接近且资源有限的情况下长时间共处。在许多方面,在食物、水和卫生设施有限的人口密集社区中努力遏制 COVID-19 的传播,在不稳定的情况下似乎违背直觉,甚至是不可能的。本文中,我们探讨了在不稳定环境下实施封锁规则的障碍。我们通过借鉴理论领域框架来概念化结构性障碍,以解释这些障碍如何影响对封锁规则的遵守。我们认为,如果没有足够的支持或干预来帮助贫困社区减轻这些结构性障碍,遵守封锁规则是困难的,这导致 COVID-19 感染持续存在。