Suppr超能文献

处理废弃消防水中的全氟和多氟烷基物质的各种末端处理途径的环境评估。

Environmental Assessment of Various End-of-Life Pathways for Treating Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Spent Fire-Extinguishing Waters.

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology (UMSICHT), Oberhausen, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Mar;40(3):947-957. doi: 10.1002/etc.4803. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are now thought to be far more prevalent in water bodies across the globe than previously reported. In particular, military bases, airports, and industrial sites are prone to contamination caused by runoff discharges from fire-extinguishing waters that contain PFAS such as aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF). These substances and their metabolites show a high degree of mobility as well as a low biotic and abiotic degradability; as a result, they are bioaccumulative and often migrate among the environmental compartments in addition to being toxic. As of now, there is no suitable end-of-life treatment process that is both technologically efficient and cost-effective for the handling of PFAS. Currently, the incineration of the collected extinguishing water at temperatures above 1100 °C is the recommended method for the disposal of PFAS to degrade material compounds. However, this method consumes extensive energy because it requires incineration of large quantities of water to treat a diluted fraction of PFAS. Aside from incineration, adsorption of PFAS on granulated activated carbon is one of the most widely used technologies, albeit with poor adsorption and often requiring very large downstream filtration systems. Finally, the application of functional precipitation agents using commercially available cationic surfactants is a novel approach (PerfluorAd [Cornelsen] process) that enables the effective precipitation of PFAS from the spent fire-extinguishing waters. Hence, the goal of the present study was to investigate the environmental impacts emanating from the proper treatment of spent fire-extinguishing water with the aforementioned 3 end-of-life treatment scenarios. A life cycle assessment was conducted for this purpose. The results show that the PerfluorAd process outperforms the other 2 treatment technologies across all environmental impact categories except for ozone depletion. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:947-957. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

摘要

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)现在被认为比以前报道的在全球水体中更为普遍。特别是,军事基地、机场和工业场所容易受到消防水径流排放的污染,这些消防水中含有 PFAS,如水性成膜泡沫(AFFF)。这些物质及其代谢物具有高度的流动性,以及较低的生物和非生物降解性;因此,它们具有生物蓄积性,并且经常在环境隔室之间迁移,而且具有毒性。到目前为止,还没有一种既技术高效又经济实惠的适用于 PFAS 处理的最终处置工艺。目前,将收集到的灭火水在 1100°C 以上的温度下焚烧,是处理 PFAS 以降解材料化合物的推荐方法。然而,这种方法消耗大量的能量,因为它需要焚烧大量的水来处理稀释的 PFAS 部分。除了焚烧,颗粒活性炭对 PFAS 的吸附是最广泛使用的技术之一,尽管吸附效果不佳,而且通常需要非常大的下游过滤系统。最后,使用市售阳离子表面活性剂作为功能沉淀剂的应用是一种新方法(PerfluorAd [Cornelsen] 工艺),它能够有效地从用过的消防水中沉淀出 PFAS。因此,本研究的目的是研究通过上述 3 种最终处置方案对用过的消防水进行适当处理所产生的环境影响。为此进行了生命周期评估。结果表明,除了臭氧消耗外,在所有环境影响类别中,PerfluorAd 工艺均优于其他 2 种处理技术。环境毒理化学 2021;40:947-957。©2020 作者。环境毒理化学由 Wiley 期刊出版公司代表 SETAC 出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验