Gettel Cameron J, Pertsch Nathan, Goldberg Elizabeth M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Ann Longterm Care. 2020 Jun;28(2):e12-e19. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
This study aimed to identify interventions that are effective in improving the transitions of care for patients from nursing homes (NHs) to emergency departments (EDs). A total of 607 studies were identified, from which 19 studies were included for full-text review. Nine pre-post intervention studies and two retrospective cohort studies met all criteria for inclusion. In the quality assessment, two (18.2%) were assessed as good quality; seven (63.6%) were fair; and two (18.2%) were poor. Nine studies (81.2%) had a severe risk of bias, primarily due to confounding and deviation from the intended intervention. Pre-post intervention studies utilized transfer checklists/forms, web-based communication networks, and multimodal approaches to improve transitions of care. Eight studies reported significant improvement in critical NH-ED transfer information completeness after intervention implementation. Three studies assessed health care utilization after intervention implementation with two studies reporting no reduction in utilization and one study reporting decreased 30-day hospital readmission and ED revisit rates. Studies evaluating patient-centered outcomes, such as whether interventions reduced harm to patients by decreasing medical errors, hospital length of stay, or the overall number of facility transfers, are needed.
本研究旨在确定能有效改善疗养院(NHs)患者向急诊科(EDs)转诊护理的干预措施。共识别出607项研究,从中纳入19项进行全文审查。9项干预前后研究和2项回顾性队列研究符合所有纳入标准。在质量评估中,2项(18.2%)被评为高质量;7项(63.6%)为中等质量;2项(18.2%)为低质量。9项研究(81.2%)存在严重的偏倚风险,主要原因是混杂因素和与预期干预的偏差。干预前后研究采用转诊清单/表格、基于网络的通信网络和多模式方法来改善护理转诊。8项研究报告称,干预实施后,关键的NH-ED转诊信息完整性有显著改善。3项研究在干预实施后评估了医疗保健利用情况,其中2项研究报告利用率没有降低,1项研究报告30天医院再入院率和急诊科复诊率下降。需要开展评估以患者为中心的结果的研究,例如干预措施是否通过减少医疗差错、缩短住院时间或减少设施转诊总数来减少对患者的伤害。