Di Carlo Heather N, Manyevitch Roni, Wu Wayland J, Maruf Mahir, Michaud Jason, Friedlander Daniel, Gearhart John P
Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):433.e1-433.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 22.
Several surgical methods have been used for primary repair of bladder exstrophy in the newborn. Complete primary repair of exstrophy (CPRE) aims to prevent the need for surgeries beyond the newborn period. Due to the rarity of bladder exstrophy, it has proven difficult in the past to analyze whether use of this method of closure truly does confer acceptable continence outcomes and hence minimizes the requirement for additional surgeries later in life.
To describe the continence outcomes of CPRE patients who went on to receive bladder neck reconstruction (BNR), and secondarily, to compare clinical features between those patients who were able to receive undergo a BNR compared to those who were not.
An IRB approved database of 1330 exstrophy-epispadias patients was used to identify referred patients after successful CPRE for management of continued urinary incontinence. Urinary continence outcomes were assessed in those who underwent modified Young Dees Leadbetter BNR following CPRE.
Sixty-one patients were referred for treatment after successful CPRE between 1996 and 2016. None developed continence or a dry interval after primary closure. Of these, forty-two (68.9%) underwent BNR by a single surgeon at a mean age of 5.8 years (range 5-8.4). The mean bladder capacity at BNR was 147 mL (range 102-210 mL). Twenty-five (59.5%) achieved day and night continence, 7 (16.7%) gained daytime continence with nocturnal leakage, and 10 (23.8%) remain totally incontinent. Mean follow-up after BNR was 5.9 years. Combined CPRE and pelvic osteotomy were performed in 100% of patients who were continent and 75% of those who were daytime dry. No continent patient had a ureteral reimplantation before BNR, whereas 4 patients with daytime continence and nocturnal leakage and 7 patients who remained continuously incontinent did.
This is the largest known series of BNRs in exstrophy patients closed by CPRE. Previous smaller studies have demonstrated mild to moderate success rates of BNR after CPRE, with many patients still requiring additional continence surgeries. The present study found similar results, with additional indication that successful primary closure and use of pelvic osteotomies may correlate with enhanced continence. This study includes outcomes from a single surgeon, with a maximum length of follow up of 13 years.
CPRE alone often does not render patients continent of urine, based on the authors' referral population. However, following BNR continence rates in this subgroup were found to reach 76%. Surgeons who treat this population should keep these factors in mind when planning continence surgeries.
几种手术方法已被用于新生儿膀胱外翻的一期修复。膀胱外翻完全一期修复(CPRE)旨在避免新生儿期之后的手术需求。由于膀胱外翻病例罕见,过去很难分析这种闭合方法的使用是否真的能带来可接受的控尿效果,从而尽量减少日后生活中额外手术的需求。
描述接受膀胱颈重建(BNR)的CPRE患者的控尿效果,其次,比较能够接受BNR的患者与不能接受BNR的患者之间的临床特征。
使用一个经机构审查委员会批准的包含1330例膀胱外翻-阴茎头型尿道上裂患者的数据库,以识别在成功进行CPRE后因持续性尿失禁而转诊的患者。对CPRE后接受改良Young Dees Leadbetter BNR的患者的尿控效果进行评估。
1996年至2016年间,61例患者在成功进行CPRE后被转诊接受治疗。一期闭合后无一例实现控尿或无尿间隔。其中,42例(68.9%)由一名外科医生进行了BNR,平均年龄为5.8岁(范围5 - 8.4岁)。BNR时的平均膀胱容量为147毫升(范围102 - 210毫升)。25例(59.5%)实现了日夜控尿,7例(16.7%)实现了日间控尿但夜间漏尿,10例(23.8%)仍完全失禁。BNR后的平均随访时间为5.9年。100%实现控尿的患者和75%日间无尿的患者接受了CPRE联合骨盆截骨术。在进行BNR之前,没有控尿的患者进行过输尿管再植术,而4例日间控尿但夜间漏尿的患者和7例持续失禁的患者进行过。
这是已知最大的一组经CPRE闭合的膀胱外翻患者接受BNR的系列研究。先前较小规模的研究表明,CPRE后BNR的成功率为轻度至中度,许多患者仍需要额外的控尿手术。本研究也发现了类似的结果,另外还表明成功的一期闭合和骨盆截骨术的使用可能与更好的控尿效果相关。本研究纳入了来自一名外科医生的结果,最长随访时间为13年。
根据作者的转诊人群,仅CPRE往往不能使患者实现尿控。然而,在这个亚组中,BNR后的控尿率达到了76%。治疗该人群的外科医生在规划控尿手术时应牢记这些因素。