Sernik Renato A, Vidal Leão Renata, Luis Bizetto Eduardo, Sanford Damasceno Rodrigo, Horvat Natally, Guido Cerri Giovanni
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ultrasound. 2019 Aug;27(3):183-190. doi: 10.1177/1742271X19840063. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
To correlate the thickness of the axillary recess capsule measured by ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging signs of adhesive capsulitis in patients with shoulder pain.
We prospectively evaluated 193 consecutive patients (141 women and 52 men, aged 40-69 years) with shoulder pain lasting 1-9 months from January 2015 to December 2016 who underwent shoulder ultrasound. All participants had routine shoulder ultrasound with additional measurement of axillary recess capsule thickness. After examinations, two groups were formed: negative ultrasound group, composed of patients with a capsule thickness of 2.0 mm or less, and positive ultrasound group, composed of individuals with a capsule thickness greater than 2.0 mm. All patients from the positive ultrasound group and 27 randomly chosen patients from the negative ultrasound group underwent shoulder magnetic resonance imaging.
In all, 169/193 patients (88%) had an axillary recess capsule thickness of 2.0 mm or less (negative ultrasound group) and 24/193 patients (12%) had a capsule thickness greater than 2.0 mm (positive ultrasound group). Twenty-seven patients from negative ultrasound group (27/169) were randomly selected to undergo shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. None of them had magnetic resonance imaging criteria for adhesive capsulitis. All patients from positive ultrasound group (24/24) underwent shoulder magnetic resonance imaging and 23 of them (23/24) had magnetic resonance imaging signs of adhesive capsulitis, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%.
In patients with shoulder pain, a thickness greater than 2.0 mm of the axillary recess capsule measured by ultrasound correlates to magnetic resonance imaging signs of adhesive capsulitis with good sensitivity and specificity.
探讨超声测量的腋窝隐窝囊厚度与肩痛患者肩周炎磁共振成像征象之间的相关性。
我们前瞻性评估了2015年1月至2016年12月期间连续193例(141名女性和52名男性,年龄40 - 69岁)肩痛持续1 - 9个月并接受肩部超声检查的患者。所有参与者均接受常规肩部超声检查,并额外测量腋窝隐窝囊厚度。检查后,分为两组:超声阴性组,由囊厚度为2.0毫米或更小的患者组成;超声阳性组,由囊厚度大于2.0毫米的个体组成。超声阳性组的所有患者以及从超声阴性组中随机选择的27名患者接受了肩部磁共振成像检查。
总共,193例患者中有169例(88%)腋窝隐窝囊厚度为2.0毫米或更小(超声阴性组),24例(12%)囊厚度大于2.0毫米(超声阳性组)。从超声阴性组中随机选择27例患者(27/169)进行肩部磁共振成像检查。他们中没有一人有肩周炎的磁共振成像标准。超声阳性组的所有患者(24/24)均接受了肩部磁共振成像检查,其中23例(23/24)有肩周炎的磁共振成像征象,敏感性为100%,特异性为96%。
在肩痛患者中,超声测量的腋窝隐窝囊厚度大于2.0毫米与肩周炎的磁共振成像征象具有良好的敏感性和特异性相关。