Gaillard Maïra, Pontailler Margaux, Danial Pichoy, Moreau de Bellaing Anne, Gaudin Régis, du Puy-Montbrun Leonora, Murtuza Bari, Haydar Ayman, Malekzadeh-Milani Sophie, Bonnet Damien, Vouhé Pascal, Raisky Olivier
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Necker Sick Children Hospital and University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Necker Sick Children Hospital-M3C and University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Nov 1;58(5):975-982. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa129.
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden death in children and young adults. The most threatening anatomy is an interarterial and an intramural course, both probably involved in ischaemic phenomena and sudden death. The treatment of interarterial AAOCA remains controversial. Most of the published studies describe the results of the unroofing technique. Our study aims to evaluate the results of a different surgical approach.
From 2005 to 2019, 61 patients were operated on for an interarterial AAOCA (median age 14.7 years). Forty patients had a right AAOCA, and 21 patients had a left AAOCA including 5 patients with intraseptal course. Seventy percent of patients were symptomatic. Five patients had an aborted sudden cardiac death. Two surgical techniques were used: an 'anatomical' repair for 35 patients (15 left and 22 right AAOCA) or a coronary translocation with creation of a neo-ostia in 19 patients (1 left and 18 right AAOCA). The 5 left AAOCA patients with an intra-septal course required a complete release of the coronary artery from the septum.
There was no early or late postoperative death. Three patients had an acute postoperative ischaemic event. Two patients required immediate angioplasty and stenting: 1 patient (7 years) with a hypoplastic right AAOCA and 1 patient (66 years) for inadequate tailoring after septal release. The third patient required an immediate surgical revision (H-2) for left AAOCA thrombosis at the level of the pericardial patch with full myocardial recovery at discharge. During follow-up, 1 patient with right AAOCA translocation and chronic chest pain required subsequent stenting and finally a coronary artery bypass grafting 2 years after initial surgery. One patient who had an asymptomatic mild right coronary stenosis 1 year after anatomical repair was successfully treated by angioplasty alone. All patients but 1 who underwent coronary translocation are totally asymptomatic. All patients with anatomical repair or septal release are free from ischaemic symptoms.
Anatomical repair might provide a better protective option for these patients. Unlike unroofing, it treats the entire intramural segment, relocates the ostium at the appropriate sinus level and corrects any acute take-off angle.
冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉(AAOCA)是儿童和年轻成人猝死的第二大主要原因。最具威胁性的解剖结构是动脉间和壁内走行,这两者可能都与缺血现象和猝死有关。动脉间AAOCA的治疗仍存在争议。大多数已发表的研究描述了开窗技术的结果。我们的研究旨在评估一种不同手术方法的结果。
2005年至2019年,61例患者接受了动脉间AAOCA手术(中位年龄14.7岁)。40例患者为右冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉,21例患者为左冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉,其中5例为间隔内走行。70%的患者有症状。5例患者发生过心脏骤停。采用了两种手术技术:35例患者(15例左冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉和22例右冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉)进行了“解剖”修复,19例患者(1例左冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉和18例右冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉)进行了冠状动脉移位并创建了新开口。5例间隔内走行的左冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉患者需要将冠状动脉从间隔完全游离。
术后无早期或晚期死亡。3例患者发生了急性术后缺血事件。2例患者需要立即进行血管成形术和支架置入:1例(7岁)右冠状动脉发育不良的患者,1例(66岁)在间隔游离后裁剪不当的患者。第3例患者因心包补片水平的左冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉血栓形成需要立即进行手术翻修(术后2小时),出院时心肌完全恢复。在随访期间,1例右冠状动脉异常起源于主动脉移位且有慢性胸痛的患者随后需要进行支架置入,最终在初次手术后2年进行了冠状动脉搭桥术。1例解剖修复术后1年无症状轻度右冠状动脉狭窄的患者仅通过血管成形术就成功治愈。除1例接受冠状动脉移位的患者外,所有患者均完全无症状。所有接受解剖修复或间隔游离的患者均无缺血症状。
解剖修复可能为这些患者提供更好的保护选择。与开窗术不同,它治疗整个壁内段,将开口重新定位在适当的窦水平,并纠正任何急性起始角度。