De Sensi Francesco, Addonisio Luigi, Baratta Pasquale, Breschi Marco, Cresti Alberto, Miracapillo Gennaro, Limbruno Ugo
Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, ESTAV Toscana Sud Est, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00800-3. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
Ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein cannulation is effective and safe during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). It is a reasonable alternative to other techniques in order to shorten procedural time and decrease perioperative complications. However, in this context, the short-axis (out-of-plane) visualization to guide the vein puncture is the most used technique. The aim of our study is to describe a single-center experience with the US long-axis (in-plane) technique defining predictors of unsuccessful puncture attempts and failure to axillary vein cannulation in a cohort of patients undergoing CIEDs procedures.
From November 2017 to June 2019, consecutive patients undergoing CIEDs procedures were enrolled in the study. US-guided long axis (in-plane) view to guide axillary vein cannulation was used in all subjects. Unsuccessful puncture attempts (UAs) and complete failures to cannulate the vein were collected for each procedure. All patients were evaluated on a daily basis until hospital discharge and at 1-month follow up visit.
Among 119 subjects (M: F = 75:44), mean age was 79 ± 9 years, mean BMI 25.7 ± 4.3 kg/m, and mean BSA 1.74 ± 0.4 m. We placed 95 pacemakers (32 single-, 61 dual-, and 2 triple-chamber) and 20 ICDs (7 single, 6 dual, 7 triple chambers). An upgrade from dual-chamber to triple-chamber device was carried out with the addition of a new lead in 3 patients. During a system revision, one new electrode was implanted. The overall leads inserted were 204. There were 33 initial unsuccessful attempts in 22/119 patients. US-guided axillary access was finally successful in 94.9% of patients (113/119). In the other cases (6/119), cephalic vein was isolated or blinded subclavian puncture was performed. Interestingly, at univariate analysis, an increasing BMI and BSA, male sex, and anticoagulant therapy were predictors of unsuccessful attempts or failure to cannulate the vein with US. Among those subjects, the multivariate logistic regression showed significant correlations only between BMI and unsuccessful attempts: odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, p = 0.009 [95% CI = 1.04-1.31], and BMI with failure to cannulate the vein: OR = 1.21, p = 0.03 [95%CI = 1.01-1.45]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves individuated the best BMI value cutoff point at 27 kg/m (area under the curve [AUC]: 68.6%) having a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 66.5% for unsuccessful puncture attempts; a BMI value of 28 kg/m (AUC 74.9%) had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 66.7% for failure to cannulate the vein with the US-guided approach.
Axillary vein long-axis (in-plane) US-guided cannulation during CIEDs implantation is characterized by a high success rate (94.9%). An elevated BMI is significantly related to unsuccessful puncture attempts or failure to cannulation. The higher is the BMI, the more are the chances to have difficult vein puncture or cannulation failure and to switch from US-guided approach to another technique.
超声(US)引导下腋静脉置管在心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)手术中是有效且安全的。它是缩短手术时间和减少围手术期并发症的其他技术的合理替代方法。然而,在这种情况下,短轴(平面外)可视化引导静脉穿刺是最常用的技术。我们研究的目的是描述单中心使用US长轴(平面内)技术的经验,确定一组接受CIED手术患者穿刺尝试失败和腋静脉置管失败的预测因素。
从2017年11月至2019年6月,连续接受CIED手术的患者纳入本研究。所有受试者均采用US引导的长轴(平面内)视图引导腋静脉置管。收集每个手术中穿刺尝试失败(UAs)和静脉置管完全失败的情况。所有患者在出院前每天进行评估,并在1个月随访时进行评估。
119名受试者(男∶女 = 75∶44),平均年龄79±9岁,平均BMI 25.7±4.3kg/m,平均体表面积(BSA)1.74±0.4m²。我们植入了95台起搏器(32台单腔、61台双腔和2台三腔)和20台植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)(7台单腔、6台双腔、7台三腔)。3例患者通过增加一根新导线将双腔设备升级为三腔设备。在系统修订期间,植入了一根新电极。总共插入导线204根。119例患者中有22例出现33次初始穿刺尝试失败。US引导下的腋静脉穿刺最终在94.9%的患者(113/119)中成功。在其他病例(6/119)中,分离了头静脉或进行了盲法锁骨下穿刺。有趣的是,单因素分析显示,BMI和BSA增加、男性以及抗凝治疗是US引导下穿刺尝试失败或静脉置管失败的预测因素。在这些受试者中,多因素逻辑回归显示仅BMI与穿刺尝试失败之间存在显著相关性:比值比(OR)=1.16,p = 0.009 [95%置信区间(CI)=1.04 - 1.31],BMI与静脉置管失败之间也存在显著相关性:OR = 1.21,p = 0.03 [95%CI = 1.01 - 1.45]。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定BMI最佳截断值为27kg/m²(曲线下面积[AUC]:68.6%),对穿刺尝试失败的敏感性为63.6%,特异性为66.5%;BMI值为28kg/m²(AUC 74.9%)对US引导下静脉置管失败的敏感性为66.7%,特异性为66.7%。
CIED植入期间腋静脉长轴(平面内)US引导下置管成功率高(94.9%)。BMI升高与穿刺尝试失败或置管失败显著相关。BMI越高,静脉穿刺困难或置管失败以及从US引导方法转换为其他技术的可能性就越大。