Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Virol. 2020 Aug 17;94(17). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01215-20.
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gene encodes an abundant linear and several circular RNAs believed to perform noncoding functions during virus replication, although an open reading frame (ORF) is retained among an unknown percentage of EBV isolates. Evidence suggests that is also transcribed during latent infection, which prompted us to investigate the contribution of this locus to latency. Analysis of transcripts transiting revealed that its transcription is widespread among B-cell lines supporting the latency I or III program of EBV protein expression and is more complex than originally presumed. EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma cell lines infected with either wild-type or two different mutant EBVs were initially indistinguishable in supporting latency III. However, cells infected with virus ultimately transitioned to the more restrictive latency I program, whereas cells infected with wild-type virus either sustained latency III or transitioned more slowly to latency I. Upon infection of primary B cells, which require latency III for growth , both viruses exhibited variably reduced immortalization potential relative to the wild-type virus. Finally, in transfection experiments, efficient protein expression from an intact ORF required the EBV posttranscriptional regulator protein SM, whose expression is limited to the replicative cycle. Thus, one way in which may contribute to latency is through a mechanism, possibly mediated or regulated by a long noncoding RNA, that supports latency III critical for the establishment of EBV latency and lifelong persistence within its host, whereas any retained protein-dependent function of may be restricted to the replication cycle. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has significant oncogenic potential that is linked to its latent infection of B lymphocytes, during which virus replication is not supported. The establishment of latent infection, which is lifelong and can precede tumor development by years, requires the concerted actions of nearly a dozen EBV proteins and numerous small non-protein-coding RNAs. Elucidating how these EBV products contribute to latency is crucial for understanding EBV's role in specific malignancies and, ultimately, for clinical intervention. Historically, EBV genes that contribute to virus replication have been excluded from consideration of a role in latency, primarily because of the general incompatibility between virus production and cell survival. However, here, we provide evidence that the genetic locus containing one such gene, , indeed contributes to key aspects of EBV latency, including its ability to promote the continuous growth of B lymphocytes, thus providing significant new insight into EBV biology and oncogenic potential.
EBV 基因编码大量的线性和几种环状 RNA,据信在病毒复制过程中发挥非编码功能,尽管 EBV 分离株中有未知比例的开放阅读框 (ORF) 被保留。有证据表明,在潜伏感染过程中也会转录 ,这促使我们研究该基因座对潜伏感染的贡献。对 转录物的分析表明,其转录在支持 EBV 蛋白表达潜伏 I 或 III 程序的 B 细胞系中广泛存在,并且比最初假设的更为复杂。最初,用野生型或两种不同的 突变型 EBV 感染 EBV 阴性 Burkitt 淋巴瘤细胞系在支持潜伏 III 方面无法区分。然而,感染 病毒的细胞最终过渡到更具限制性的潜伏 I 程序,而感染野生型病毒的细胞要么持续潜伏 III,要么更缓慢地过渡到潜伏 I。在感染需要潜伏 III 才能生长的原代 B 细胞时,两种 病毒相对于野生型病毒表现出不同程度的永生化潜力降低。最后,在转染实验中,完整 ORF 的有效蛋白表达需要 EBV 转录后调节蛋白 SM,其表达仅限于复制周期。因此, 可能通过一种机制为潜伏感染做出贡献,该机制可能通过长非编码 RNA 介导或调节,支持对 EBV 潜伏感染和在其宿主中终生持续存在至关重要的潜伏 III,而 的任何保留的蛋白依赖性功能可能仅限于复制周期。EBV 具有显著的致癌潜力,与 B 淋巴细胞的潜伏感染有关,在此期间不支持病毒复制。终身潜伏感染,并且可以在肿瘤发展之前数年发生,需要将近 12 种 EBV 蛋白和许多小非蛋白编码 RNA 的协同作用。阐明这些 EBV 产物如何有助于潜伏感染对于理解 EBV 在特定恶性肿瘤中的作用以及最终的临床干预至关重要。从历史上看,有助于病毒复制的 EBV 基因已被排除在潜伏作用的考虑之外,主要是因为病毒产生和细胞存活之间的普遍不兼容性。然而,在这里,我们提供的证据表明,包含这样一个基因的遗传基因座, 确实有助于 EBV 潜伏感染的关键方面,包括其促进 B 淋巴细胞持续生长的能力,从而为 EBV 生物学和致癌潜力提供了重要的新见解。