Suppr超能文献

走自己的路:工作动机需求量表(Mind@Work)的跨文化验证

Going Your Own Way: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Motivational Demands at Work Scale (Mind@Work).

作者信息

Taris Toon W, Hu Qiao

机构信息

Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01223. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In modern jobs, performing well at work requires to an increasing degree that workers manage and motivate themselves for their tasks. Rather than to rely on a supervisor, they must set their own goals, decide how hard they work to achieve that goal, and decide when the task is completed. This manuscript describes the validation of an instrument that measures the extent to which workers must deal with such "motivational job demands"; the Motivational Demands at Work Scale (Mind@Work). Using data from a Dutch ( = 308) and a Chinese ( = 681) sample of working adults, confirmatory factor analysis showed that this instrument was reliable and robust in both samples, and that the factor structures obtained in both samples were highly comparable. Subsequent analyses demonstrated that high scores on the dimensions of the Mind@Work were associated with higher levels of engagement, work passion, job crafting and innovation behavior, even after controlling for job control, and job demands. These findings suggest that motivational job demands can be measured in a reliable and valid way. Thus, more research that examines the potential of this new concept for well-being and performance of employees seems warranted.

摘要

在现代工作中,要在工作中表现出色,越来越需要员工自我管理并激励自己完成任务。他们必须自己设定目标,决定为实现该目标付出多大努力,并决定任务何时完成,而不是依赖主管。本手稿描述了一种工具的验证过程,该工具用于衡量员工必须应对此类“激励性工作要求”的程度,即工作中的激励需求量表(Mind@Work)。使用来自荷兰(n = 308)和中国(n = 681)在职成年人样本的数据,验证性因素分析表明,该工具在两个样本中都是可靠且稳健的,并且在两个样本中获得的因素结构具有高度可比性。后续分析表明,即使在控制了工作控制和工作要求之后,Mind@Work量表各维度的高分仍与更高水平的敬业度、工作热情、工作重塑和创新行为相关。这些发现表明,可以以可靠且有效的方式衡量激励性工作要求。因此,似乎有必要进行更多研究,探讨这一新概念对员工幸福感和绩效的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Going Your Own Way: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Motivational Demands at Work Scale (Mind@Work).
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01223. eCollection 2020.
2
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;23(2):289-301. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000081. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers.
Work Stress. 2012 Oct;26(4):365-384. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.733543. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
7
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;18(2):230-40. doi: 10.1037/a0032141. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
High Job Demands, Still Engaged and Not Burned Out? The Role of Job Crafting.
Int J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;24(4):619-627. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9638-3.
9
Job crafting, work engagement, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study.
Biopsychosoc Med. 2017 Feb 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-017-0091-y. eCollection 2017.
10
Balancing Work Life: Job Crafting, Work Engagement, and Workaholism in the Finnish Public Sector.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:817008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817008. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Appraisal of Job Autonomy by Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Sep 25;8:23779608221127823. doi: 10.1177/23779608221127823. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenge and hindrance appraisals of job demands: one man's meat, another man's poison?
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020 Jan;33(1):31-46. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1673133. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Resource Crafting: Is It Really 'Resource' Crafting-Or Just Crafting?
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 20;10:614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00614. eCollection 2019.
3
Transitioning Towards New Ways of Working: Do Job Demands, Job Resources, Burnout, and Engagement Change?
Psychol Rep. 2018 Aug;121(4):736-766. doi: 10.1177/0033294117740134. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(2):121-43. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.931378. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
5
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Watching the paint dry at work: psychometric examination of the Dutch Boredom Scale.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013 Sep;26(5):508-25. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.720676. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
7
Costs and benefits of autonomy when learning a task: an experimental approach.
J Soc Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;151(3):292-313. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.481688.
8
Job control and coworker support improve employee job performance.
Ind Health. 2010;48(6):845-51. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1162. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
On the role of passion for work in burnout: a process model.
J Pers. 2010 Feb;78(1):289-312. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00616.x.
10
Organizational behavior: a review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables.
Annu Rev Psychol. 1984;35:627-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.003211.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验