IRyS Group, School of Physical Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, Chile.
GALENO Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cadiz, 11003 Cadiz, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124529.
. Recess is a great opportunity to interrupt sedentary behaviour and increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in schoolchildren. This quasi-experimental study aimed to compare the levels of physical activity (PA) during the school day of children in a school intervention programme vs. those in a control group, and to determine compliance with MVPA recommendations. A sample of 154 schoolchildren (6-12 years old) was obtained from several schools (70 with the intervention and 84 controls). This programme was structured with a duration of 90 min/session and performed three times/week. PA levels were recorded with triaxial accelerometers during the school day: during recess, during a PA session or physical education session (PE), and during lunchtime. No pre-intervention evaluation was performed. The MVPA of the control group was higher than that of the intervention group during the first recess ( < 0.001). None of the groups complied with the recommendations for steps during the PA or PE sessions. During the PA session, sedentary time was lower and MVPA was higher, in the intervention group than in the control group. Fifty percent of the children from the intervention group complied with the MVPA recommendations, vs. 22.7% of those in the control group. The schoolchildren in the intervention group performed more MVPA than those in the control group. Future interventions could include other periods, such as recess and lunchtime, which are opportunities for improving the MVPA levels of schoolchildren.
课间休息是打断久坐行为并增加学童中中等至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)的绝佳机会。这项准实验研究旨在比较学校干预计划中的儿童在学校日期间的体力活动(PA)水平与对照组的水平,并确定是否符合 MVPA 建议。
从几所学校获得了 154 名 6-12 岁的学童样本(干预组 70 名,对照组 84 名)。该方案的结构为每次 90 分钟/节,每周进行三次。在学校日期间,使用三轴加速度计记录 PA 水平:课间休息时、PA 或体育课(PE)期间以及午餐时间。未进行干预前的评估。
在第一次课间休息时,对照组的 MVPA 高于干预组(<0.001)。没有一组符合 PA 或 PE 期间的步数建议。在 PA 期间,干预组的久坐时间较低,MVPA 较高。干预组 50%的儿童符合 MVPA 建议,而对照组为 22.7%。
干预组的学童比对照组的学童进行了更多的 MVPA。未来的干预措施可以包括课间休息和午餐时间等其他时段,这是提高学童 MVPA 水平的机会。