Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
Institute of New Frontier Research, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 29;35(25):e196. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e196.
Globally, YouTube is one of the most popular websites, and the content is not restricted to entertainment. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of information in YouTube videos pertaining to hysterectomy.
We explored YouTube using the search terms "hysterectomy" and "remove uterus." The videos that appeared were sorted using the filter "sort by view count." Of the initial 100 videos, the top 50 videos for each search term were included for review, as determined by the "relevance" filter based on YouTube's algorithm. After excluding 34 videos for various reasons, 66 were included in the final analysis. Each video rated as "useful" was further analyzed for reliability and completeness of information; a set of pre-determined criteria were modified from a previous study and used to grade the quality of videos.
The top 66 videos on hysterectomy had a total of 4,679,118 views. Based on authorship, the videos were categorized as follows: videos uploaded by patients, 37%; academic videos, 35%; videos uploaded by physicians, 13%; commercial videos, 4%; and videos uploaded by non-physicians, 2%. The type of content was also categorized: 50% of the videos recorded personal experiences, 23% recorded surgical techniques, 21% involved explanations of the surgery, and 4% were commercial videos. The majority of the videos made by patients were negatively biased toward hysterectomy surgery (71.72%), while the majority of those made by academics or physicians were surgical educational videos for doctors, not patients.
YouTube is currently not an appropriate source for patients to gain information on hysterectomy. Physicians should be aware of the limitations and provide up-to-date and peer-reviewed content on the website.
在全球范围内,YouTube 是最受欢迎的网站之一,其内容不仅限于娱乐。本研究旨在评估与子宫切除术相关的 YouTube 视频信息的质量。
我们使用搜索词“子宫切除术”和“切除子宫”来探索 YouTube。使用过滤器“按浏览量排序”对出现的视频进行排序。根据 YouTube 算法的“相关性”过滤器,我们对前 100 个视频进行了排序,每个搜索词的前 50 个视频都包含在审查中。由于各种原因排除 34 个视频后,最终有 66 个视频被纳入最终分析。对每个被评为“有用”的视频进行信息可靠性和完整性的进一步分析;一套预先确定的标准是从以前的研究中修改而来的,用于对视频质量进行分级。
关于子宫切除术的前 66 个视频的总浏览量为 4679118 次。根据作者身份,视频分为以下几类:患者上传的视频,占 37%;学术视频,占 35%;医生上传的视频,占 13%;商业视频,占 4%;非医生上传的视频,占 2%。内容类型也分为:50%的视频记录个人经历,23%记录手术技术,21%涉及手术解释,4%是商业视频。大多数由患者制作的视频对子宫切除术手术持负面偏见(71.72%),而大多数由学者或医生制作的视频是针对医生而不是患者的手术教育视频。
YouTube 目前不是患者获取子宫切除术信息的合适来源。医生应该意识到这些局限性,并在该网站上提供最新的同行评审内容。