Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit, Aveiro Healthcare Centre, Aveiro, Portugal.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Drugs Aging. 2020 Aug;37(8):605-616. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00779-6.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Older patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are particularly susceptible to inhaler technique errors and poor clinical outcomes. Several factors may influence their risk, but most studies are inconsistent and contradictory. We developed a tool for the major predictors of individual risk in these patients.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this multicentre, cross-sectional study, several demographic, socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were collected as potential predictors. Clinical features and inhaler technique performance were the main outcomes. Linear and logistic regression models were set up to identify significant variables. Subgroup analysis was performed according to age, cognitive performance and different types of inhalers.
We included 130 participants, mean age of 74.4 (± 6.4) years. Mean years of device use were 5.8 (± 7.3). Inhaler errors affected 71.6% (95% CI 64-78.5) and critical mistakes 31.1% (95% CI 24-38.8). There were respiratory comorbidities in 82.3% of participants, and 56.2% had moderate to severe disease. A predictive score of misuse probability was developed for clinical practice, including points attributable to cognitive score, adherence and having received previous education on a placebo device. Other significant variables of individual risk were having respiratory allergies or comorbidities, smoking status, depression and educational level. Worse performance was detected in cognitively impaired patients older than 75 years who were using dry powder inhalers (DPI). Lung function was associated with smoking load, incorrect dose activation and absent end pause after inhalation.
Individual risk assessment in older individuals should focus on inhaler technique performance (mainly on dose activation and end pause) and adherence, smoking, respiratory comorbidities and cognitive impairment. Placebo device training provided by doctors seems to best suit these patients.
背景/目的:老年哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者特别容易出现吸入器技术错误和临床疗效不佳的情况。有几个因素可能会影响他们的风险,但大多数研究结果不一致且相互矛盾。我们开发了一种工具,用于评估这些患者个体风险的主要预测因素。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项多中心、横断面研究中,我们收集了几个人口统计学、社会经济学和临床特征作为潜在的预测因素。临床特征和吸入器技术性能是主要的观察结果。建立了线性和逻辑回归模型来识别显著变量。根据年龄、认知表现和不同类型的吸入器进行亚组分析。
我们纳入了 130 名参与者,平均年龄为 74.4(±6.4)岁。平均使用设备年限为 5.8(±7.3)年。吸入器错误发生率为 71.6%(95%CI 64-78.5),严重错误发生率为 31.1%(95%CI 24-38.8)。82.3%的参与者有呼吸系统合并症,56.2%的参与者有中重度疾病。为临床实践制定了一种误用概率预测评分,包括与认知评分、依从性和使用安慰剂装置接受过先前教育相关的分数。其他重要的个体风险变量包括有呼吸过敏或合并症、吸烟状况、抑郁和教育水平。在认知受损且年龄大于 75 岁的使用干粉吸入器(DPI)的患者中,检测到较差的性能。肺功能与吸烟负荷、剂量激活错误和吸入后无终末停顿有关。
对老年患者的个体风险评估应侧重于吸入器技术性能(主要是剂量激活和终末停顿)和依从性、吸烟、呼吸系统合并症和认知障碍。医生提供的安慰剂装置培训似乎最适合这些患者。