Aydin Kader C, Demirel Oğuzhan, Özcan Mutlu
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey -
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Jun;69(3):148-152. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04286-9.
To compare the image quality of two different digital imaging systems; one photostimulable phosphor plate system (PSP) and a direct digital radiography system with CMOS imaging sensor; via evaluating contrast resolution among four different exposure times.
Endodontically treated incisor teeth embedded in paraffin blocks are aligned next to a 99.5% Al wedge and exposed for 0.8, 0.1,0.125 and 0.16 seconds using both the CMOS and PSP systems. Using ImageJ software, 5 isometric and isogridded ROI from each root filling area and isometric ROI from the Al stepwedge were calculated.
Evaluation of the total of 120 images displayed that PSP system produced significantly higher contrast resolution (P<0.05) in regard to pixel values than the CMOS. The CMOS system was non- responsive to increasing dose (P=0.000). Regarding the EqAl values, no significant difference was determined between groups (P>0.05).
The contrast resolution was higher using the PSP system. It can be estimated that, filling material will be more obvious under lower doses using PSP.