Suppr超能文献

电休克治疗疗程的频率和持续时间:近期证据评估

Frequency and Duration of Course of ECT Sessions: An Appraisal of Recent Evidence.

作者信息

Thirthalli Jagadisha, Naik Shalini S, Kunigiri Girish

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.

Consultant Psychiatrist, Bradgate Mental Health Unit, Leicester, England, UK.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Apr 25;42(3):207-218. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_410_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

This paper aims to review the recent literature regarding factors influencing the frequency and number of sessions during a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for different psychiatric disorders. We systematically reviewed English-language papers of clinical trials of ECT published since the year 2000 in terms of frequency and number of sessions of ECT.

RESULTS

None of the 30 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were specifically designed to study frequency or number of sessions of ECT. A preliminary inference may be drawn regarding the number of sessions from the information available in these papers. For depression, patients receiving brief-pulse ECT needed fewer sessions than those receiving ultra-brief ECT when these were delivered at 8-times the threshold with unilateral electrode placement or at 2.5-times the threshold with bilateral placement. For schizophrenia, those receiving bifrontal ECT and ECT at 4-times the threshold-level stimulus needed fewer sessions than those receiving bitemporal ECT and 2-times the threshold-level stimulus, respectively. There were no clinical trials of the frequency of ECT sessions.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

As there is a dearth of studies specifically examining frequency and number of ECT sessions, broad recommendations from professional bodies should continue to guide practice.

摘要

目的与方法

本文旨在综述近期有关影响不同精神疾病患者在电休克治疗(ECT)疗程中治疗频率和治疗次数的因素的文献。我们系统回顾了2000年以来发表的关于ECT临床试验的英文论文,内容涉及ECT的治疗频率和治疗次数。

结果

符合我们纳入标准的30项研究中,没有一项是专门设计用于研究ECT治疗频率或治疗次数的。根据这些论文中提供的信息,可以对治疗次数得出初步推断。对于抑郁症,当采用单侧电极放置,以阈值的8倍电量进行短暂脉冲ECT治疗,或采用双侧放置,以阈值的2.5倍电量进行超短暂脉冲ECT治疗时,接受短暂脉冲ECT治疗的患者所需治疗次数少于接受超短暂脉冲ECT治疗的患者。对于精神分裂症,接受双额叶ECT治疗和以阈值4倍电量进行ECT治疗的患者所需治疗次数分别少于接受双侧颞叶ECT治疗和以阈值2倍电量进行ECT治疗的患者。没有关于ECT治疗频率的临床试验。

临床意义

由于缺乏专门研究ECT治疗频率和治疗次数的研究,专业机构的广泛建议应继续指导临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f0/7320735/9f59d1284f79/IJPsyM-42-207-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验