Modai-Snir Tal, van Ham Maarten
OTB - Research for the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5043, 2600GA Delft, The Netherlands.
School of Geography & Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland KY16 9AL UK.
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2019;12(2):423-443. doi: 10.1007/s12061-017-9249-z. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Neighbourhood socioeconomic change is a complex phenomenon which is driven by multiple processes. Most research has focused on the role of urban-level processes, which lead to an exchange of relative positions among neighbourhoods of a single metropolitan area. Consequently, the effects of structural processes on neighbourhood socioeconomic change, such as overall income growth or decline, and increasing inequality, have been neglected. This is reflected in the standard methodological practices; the common measures of neighbourhood change exclude the effect of overall growth or decline and confound the effects of urban processes with the effect of increase in inequality. This paper proposes a method that was originally developed for understanding income mobility of individuals, to decompose total neighbourhood socioeconomic change measured in absolute terms into its contributing components. The approach enables to take account of all processes that generate neighbourhood socioeconomic change, while distinguishing between them. The method is demonstrated in an empirical analysis of neighbourhood socioeconomic change across 22 metropolitan areas in the US. The findings indicate that structural processes can be most substantial in generating change. Neighbourhood socioeconomic change in 'superstar cities' is mostly generated by the growth in overall incomes, with a relatively low contribution of increasing inequality. Conversely, in declining cities it is mostly driven by overall decline and increasing inequality. An additional finding relates to the interaction between urban processes and increasing inequality. These processes work in opposite directions such that any increase in positions of low-income neighbourhoods can be totally offset by an income decrease due to increasing inequality.
邻里社会经济变化是一个由多种过程驱动的复杂现象。大多数研究都集中在城市层面过程的作用上,这些过程导致单一都市区内邻里之间相对位置的交换。因此,结构过程对邻里社会经济变化的影响,如总体收入增长或下降以及不平等加剧,一直被忽视。这反映在标准的方法论实践中;邻里变化的常见衡量方法排除了总体增长或下降的影响,并将城市过程的影响与不平等加剧的影响混为一谈。本文提出了一种最初为理解个人收入流动性而开发的方法,将以绝对值衡量的邻里社会经济总变化分解为其构成部分。该方法能够考虑到所有产生邻里社会经济变化的过程,同时区分它们。该方法在美国22个大都市区的邻里社会经济变化实证分析中得到了验证。研究结果表明,结构过程在产生变化方面可能最为显著。“超级明星城市”的邻里社会经济变化主要由总体收入增长产生,不平等加剧的贡献相对较低。相反,在衰落的城市中,它主要由总体下降和不平等加剧驱动。另一个发现涉及城市过程与不平等加剧之间的相互作用。这些过程方向相反,以至于低收入邻里地位的任何提高都可能因不平等加剧导致的收入下降而被完全抵消。