, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09569-6.
Zagaria et al. (Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, X 1-44, 2020) argue that psychology is a science marked by theoretical chaos and that it is possible to rectify this by letting the theoretical framework of evolutionary psychology serve as a foundation for psychology at large. While agreeing to the fact that psychology lacks direction, I maintain that this problem is not theoretical and hence, not rectifiable through the postulations of a theory. Following Wittgenstein, I argue that the disorganised state of psychology is due to an insufficient sensitivity to the meaning of psychological terms in ordinary language. In short, psychology's problem is grammatical. Hence, what needs to be done is to examine the grammar of psychological concepts. Many scholars have contributed to this kind of examination but few as extensively as Harré, who stressed the primacy of the concept of a person for discourses about human mental powers and their exercise. This is the Taxonomic Priority Principle. Grounding psychological research in evolutionary theory would amount to a violation of it and thus, I claim that it is mistaken to do so. The approach best suited to administer this principle is that of cultural psychology.
扎加里亚等人(《综合心理与行为科学》,X1-44,2020)认为,心理学是一门以理论混乱为标志的科学,可以通过让进化心理学的理论框架作为整个心理学的基础来纠正这一问题。虽然我同意心理学缺乏方向的事实,但我认为这个问题不是理论上的,因此不能通过一个理论的假设来解决。我遵循维特根斯坦的观点,认为心理学的混乱状态是由于对日常语言中心理学术语的意义缺乏敏感性所致。简而言之,心理学的问题是语法上的。因此,需要做的是检查心理概念的语法。许多学者对这种检查做出了贡献,但像哈雷那样广泛地研究的学者却很少,他强调了对人的概念的重视,因为这是关于人类精神力量及其运用的论述的基础。这就是分类优先原则。将心理学研究建立在进化理论的基础上,就等于违反了这一原则,因此,我认为这样做是错误的。最适合实施这一原则的方法是文化心理学的方法。