Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital Brandenburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2021 Feb;193(2):186-193. doi: 10.1055/a-1212-5915. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
The working group for gastrointestinal and abdominal imaging within the German Radiological Society performed a nationwide online survey in order to assess the current status regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS, a classification for evaluation of liver lesions in patients at risk.
Using the website www.deutsches-krankenhausverzeichnis.de a list of hospitals was generated meeting the criteria internal medicine, gastroenterology, general and visceral surgery and radiology (n = 391). Randomly, 102 department directors were contacted, and asked to name one consultant and one resident from their department in order to participate in the survey. 177 potential participants were invited to fill out an approximately 10-minute online survey in the form of 17 questions regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS. The results of the survey were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics.
77 participants were registered, which corresponds to a response rate of 43.5 %. 47 % of all participants were radiologists, 30 % surgeons and 23 % internal doctors/gastroenterologists, respectively, many with more than 13 years of professional experience (37.2 %). The majority of participants worked in a hospital with a focus (37.2 %) or a university hospital (29.1 %). Even though the majority of participants knows about or has heard of LI-RADS (73.2 %), only a minority uses the classification themselves (26 %) or within the context of tumor boards (19.2 %).
The results of our survey demonstrate that LI-RADS is relatively known in Germany, the application however quite sparse. This is in contrast to the general desire and endeavor for more standardized reporting in radiology.
· LI-RADS is not yet broadly implemented in clinical routine in Germany. · The sparse application is in contrast to the general desire for more standardized reporting in radiology. · Interdisciplinary education may support the propagation and use of the LI-RDAS classification.
· Ringe KI, Gut A, Grenacher L et al. LI-RADS in the year 2020 - Are you already using it or still considering? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 186 - 193.
德国放射学会的胃肠道和腹部成像工作组进行了一项全国性的在线调查,以评估 LI-RADS 的认知和应用现状,LI-RADS 是一种用于评估高危人群肝脏病变的分类方法。
使用网站 www.deutsches-krankenhausverzeichnis.de 生成了一份符合内科、胃肠病学、普通和内脏外科以及放射学标准的医院名单(n=391)。随机联系了 102 名系主任,请他们从各自部门中指定一名顾问和一名住院医师参加调查。177 名潜在参与者受邀填写一份大约 10 分钟的在线问卷,共 17 个问题,内容涉及对 LI-RADS 的认知和应用。通过描述性统计方法分析调查结果。
共登记了 77 名参与者,回应率为 43.5%。所有参与者中,47%为放射科医生,30%为外科医生,23%为内科医生/胃肠病学家,其中许多人拥有超过 13 年的专业经验(37.2%)。大多数参与者在专注于(37.2%)或大学医院(29.1%)的医院工作。尽管大多数参与者了解或听说过 LI-RADS(73.2%),但只有少数人自己使用该分类(26%)或在肿瘤委员会中使用(19.2%)。
我们的调查结果表明,LI-RADS 在德国相对知名,但应用相当稀疏。这与放射科更标准化报告的普遍愿望和努力形成鲜明对比。
·LI-RADS 尚未在德国临床常规中广泛实施。·稀疏的应用与放射科更标准化报告的普遍愿望形成鲜明对比。·跨学科教育可能有助于推广和使用 LI-RDAS 分类。