Jowkar-Baniani Gelareh, Schmuckler Mark A
Department of Psychology University of Toronto Scarborough.
Infancy. 2011 Mar;16(2):211-226. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00038.x.
Two experiments investigated 9-month-old infants' abilities to recognize the correspondence between an actual three-dimensional (3D) object and its two-dimensional (2D) representation, looking specifically at representations that did not literally depict the actual object: schematic line drawings. In Experiment 1, infants habituated to a line drawing of either a doll or a sheep and were then tested with the actual objects themselves. Infants habituated to the sheep drawing recovered to the unfamiliar but not the familiar object, showing a novelty preference. Infants habituated to the doll drawing, however, recovered to both familiar and unfamiliar objects, failing to show any preference between the two. In Experiment 2, infants habituated to the 3D objects and were then tested with the 2D line drawings. In this case, both groups of infants showed a preference only for the novel displays. Together these findings demonstrate that 9-month-old infants recognize the correspondence between 3D objects and their 2D representations, even when these representations are not literal copies of the objects themselves.
两项实验研究了9个月大婴儿识别实际三维(3D)物体与其二维(2D)表征之间对应关系的能力,特别关注那些并非如实描绘实际物体的表征:示意性线条画。在实验1中,婴儿先对玩偶或绵羊的线条画形成习惯化,然后用实际物体进行测试。习惯化于绵羊画的婴儿对不熟悉的物体而非熟悉的物体恢复了兴趣,表现出对新奇事物的偏好。然而,习惯化于玩偶画的婴儿对熟悉和不熟悉的物体都恢复了兴趣,在两者之间未表现出任何偏好。在实验2中,婴儿先对3D物体形成习惯化,然后用2D线条画进行测试。在这种情况下,两组婴儿都只对新奇的展示表现出偏好。这些研究结果共同表明,9个月大的婴儿能够识别3D物体与其2D表征之间的对应关系,即使这些表征并非物体本身的如实复制。