Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jun;110(6):822-830. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01714-w. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
A high resting heart rate (RHR) is associated with an increase in adverse events. However, the long-term prognostic value in a general population is unclear. We aimed to investigate the impact of RHR, based on both baseline and time-updated values, on mortality in a middle-aged male cohort.
A random population sample of 852 men, all born in 1913, was followed from age 50 until age 98, with repeated examinations including RHR over a period of 48 years. The impact of baseline and time-updated RHR on cause-specific mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models and cubic spline models.
A baseline RHR of ≥ 90 beats per minute (bpm) was associated with higher all-cause mortality, as compared with an RHR of 60-70 bpm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.19, P = 0.003), but not with cardiovascular (CV) mortality. A time-updated RHR of < 60 bpm (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.85, P = 0.014) and a time-updated RHR of 70-80 bpm (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.75, P = 0.036) were both associated with higher CV mortality as compared with an RHR of 60-70 bpm after multivariable adjustment. Analyses using cubic spline models confirmed that the association of time-updated RHR with all-cause and CV mortality complied with a U-shaped curve with 60 bpm as a reference.
In this middle-aged male cohort, a time-updated RHR of 60-70 bpm was associated with the lowest CV mortality, suggesting that a time-updated RHR could be a useful long-term prognostic index in the general population.
静息心率(RHR)升高与不良事件增加相关。然而,其在一般人群中的长期预后价值尚不清楚。我们旨在研究基于基线和时间更新值的 RHR 对中年男性队列死亡率的影响。
对所有出生于 1913 年的 852 名男性进行随机人群抽样,从 50 岁随访至 98 岁,在此期间重复进行 RHR 检查,时间长达 48 年。使用 Cox 比例风险模型和三次样条模型评估基线和时间更新的 RHR 对特定原因死亡率的影响。
与 RHR 为 60-70 bpm 的人群相比,基线 RHR≥90 bpm 与全因死亡率升高相关(风险比 [HR] 1.60,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.17-2.19,P=0.003),但与心血管(CV)死亡率无关。与 RHR 为 60-70 bpm 的人群相比,时间更新的 RHR<60 bpm(HR 1.41,95% CI 1.07-1.85,P=0.014)和 70-80 bpm(HR 1.34,95% CI 1.02-1.75,P=0.036)与 CV 死亡率升高相关,经多变量调整后。三次样条模型分析证实,时间更新的 RHR 与全因和 CV 死亡率的关系呈 U 形曲线,以 60 bpm 为参考。
在该中年男性队列中,时间更新的 RHR 为 60-70 bpm 与最低的 CV 死亡率相关,这表明时间更新的 RHR 可能是一般人群中有用的长期预后指标。