Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):80.e1-80.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.031. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
Urinary incontinence is influenced by multiple factors, and the prevalence of urinary incontinence subtypes may differ by race and ethnicity.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of urinary incontinence subtypes and associated bother among women by race and ethnicity.
This cross-sectional analysis used data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, an observational cohort study of 4 racial and ethnic groups recruited from 6 communities from the United States. At the sixth follow-up examination, urinary symptoms were ascertained with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. The prevalence rate ratios of stress urinary incontinence, urgency urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence by race and ethnicity were calculated using generalized linear models for the binomial family while adjusting for covariates. The degree of bother was based on a scale of 0 (none) to 10 (greatest bother), and presence of any bother was defined as a score of ≥3.
Among the 1749 female participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who completed the sixth follow-up examination, 1628 (93%) completed the questionnaire. Women who did not complete the questionnaire were older than those who completed the questionnaire (average age, 82.2 [standard deviation, 9.5] vs 73.7 [standard deviation, 8.4] years; P<.01) and more likely to use diuretics (29.8% vs 18.9%; P<.01). Among those who completed the questionnaire (n=1628), 39.4% were white, 12.5% were Chinese, 27.2% were black, and 20.9% were Hispanic. After adjusting for covariates, stress urinary incontinence (prevalence rate ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.86) and mixed urinary incontinence (prevalence rate ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.89) regardless of bother scores were significantly less prevalent among black vs white women, although no significant racial and ethnic differences in stress or mixed urinary incontinence prevalence were noted for Chinese or Hispanic women vs white women. No racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of urgency urinary incontinence were noted after the adjustment for covariates. Most women with urinary incontinence reported bother scores of ≥3 regardless of race and ethnicity and urinary incontinence subtype, and bother scores did not differ significantly by race and ethnicity.
Frequency of urinary incontinence subtypes may differ by race and ethnicity, but older women who report urinary incontinence are likely to have associated bother regardless of race and ethnicity.
尿失禁受多种因素影响,尿失禁亚型的患病率可能因种族和民族而异。
本研究旨在确定不同种族和民族女性尿失禁亚型的患病率及相关困扰程度。
本横断面分析使用了来自美国 6 个社区的 4 个种族和民族的多民族动脉粥样硬化研究(一项观察性队列研究)的数据。在第六次随访检查时,使用国际尿失禁咨询问卷评估尿症状。采用二项式家族的广义线性模型计算压力性尿失禁、急迫性尿失禁和混合性尿失禁的患病率比率,同时调整协变量。困扰程度基于 0(无)到 10(最大困扰)的评分,任何困扰的存在定义为评分≥3。
在完成第六次随访检查的多民族动脉粥样硬化研究的 1749 名女性参与者中,有 1628 名(93%)完成了问卷。未完成问卷的女性比完成问卷的女性年龄更大(平均年龄 82.2[标准差 9.5]岁 vs 73.7[标准差 8.4]岁;P<.01),且更有可能使用利尿剂(29.8% vs 18.9%;P<.01)。在完成问卷的 1628 名女性中,39.4%为白人,12.5%为中国人,27.2%为黑人,20.9%为西班牙裔。调整协变量后,无论困扰评分如何,黑人女性压力性尿失禁(患病率比率,0.47;95%置信区间,0.25-0.86)和混合性尿失禁(患病率比率,0.58;95%置信区间,0.38-0.89)的患病率均显著低于白人女性,但中国或西班牙裔女性与白人女性相比,压力性或混合性尿失禁的患病率无显著的种族和民族差异。调整协变量后,未观察到急迫性尿失禁的患病率存在种族和民族差异。大多数有尿失禁的女性报告困扰评分≥3,无论种族和民族以及尿失禁亚型如何,困扰评分无显著的种族和民族差异。
尿失禁亚型的频率可能因种族和民族而异,但报告有尿失禁的老年女性无论种族和民族如何,都可能存在相关困扰。