University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kigali, Rwanda.
Department of Surgery, Bushenge Provincial Hospital, Nyamasheke, Rwanda.
World J Surg. 2020 Nov;44(11):3651-3657. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05708-7. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
Sepsis is common in surgical patients, and its presence influences the outcomes in those to undergo surgery. Factors such as advanced age, presence of comorbidities and many other conditions increase mortality in surgical patients with sepsis. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score simplified into qSOFA helps to define sepsis and to identify patients who are likely to die from it. Sepsis in surgery is under investigated in low- and middle-income countries and so are the factors for mortality in that specific surgical population. Our aim was to develop a prognostic tool accurate in predicting outcomes in surgical patients with sepsis who present at University Teaching Hospitals of Kigali (CHUK) and Butare (CHUB) and in other centers with limited resources METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted over a period of 1 year from February 2018 to January 2019. The surgical patients with sepsis recruited in the first 6 months at CHUK served as the derivation cohort and those recruited in the next 6 months from both CHUK and CHUB served as the validation cohort. The Kigali surgical sepsis (KiSS) score was derived, and to determine its accuracy in predicting mortality, we measured sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. We then compared this with qSOFA score.
A total of 288 patients were recruited with 144 in each cohort. The mean age was 36.5, and median age was 32.6. The mean length of hospital stay (LoHS) was 22.9 days. The overall intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate was 51.4%, and the surgical sepsis-related hospital mortality rate was 21.7%. Factors associated with surgical sepsis-related hospital mortality were age above 55 years (p = 0.034), presence of comorbidities (p = 0.069), hypotension (p = 0.014), tachycardia (p = 0.061), tachypnea (p = 0.028), decreased level of consciousness (p = 0.021), presence of GIT perforation (p = 0.026) and number of impaired organ function (p = 0.035). A predictive score (KiSS score) consisting of six parameters was derived from these factors and compared to qSOFA score. The sensitivity of KiSS score in predicting mortality was 73% (vs 52% for qSOFA), and the specificity was 97% (vs 87% for qSOFA). The predictive validity for hospital mortality was assessed by AUROC curve, and it was 0.939 (95% CI, p < 0.001) for KiSS and 0.684 (95% CI, p < 0.001) for qSOFA.
The KiSS score was effective in predicting surgical sepsis-related hospital mortality in low-resource setting. The KiSS score showed an added advantage of stratifying septic surgical patients to be operated on into those with good, variable and poor prognosis.
脓毒症在外科患者中很常见,其存在会影响接受手术的患者的预后。年龄较大、合并症存在和许多其他情况等因素会增加脓毒症外科患者的死亡率。简化后的序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分 qSOFA 有助于定义脓毒症,并识别可能因此而死亡的患者。在中低收入国家,外科脓毒症的研究不足,特定外科人群的死亡率因素也是如此。我们的目的是开发一种准确的预后工具,以预测在基加利教学医院 (CHUK) 和布塔雷 (CHUB) 以及其他资源有限的中心就诊的外科脓毒症患者的结局。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,于 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 1 月进行了为期 1 年。在 CHUK 前 6 个月内招募的外科脓毒症患者作为推导队列,而在接下来的 6 个月内从 CHUK 和 CHUB 招募的患者作为验证队列。推导了基加利外科脓毒症 (KiSS) 评分,并通过测量敏感性、特异性和接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线下面积 (AUROC) 来确定其预测死亡率的准确性。然后将其与 qSOFA 评分进行比较。
共招募了 288 名患者,每个队列 144 名。平均年龄为 36.5 岁,中位年龄为 32.6 岁。平均住院时间 (LoS) 为 22.9 天。总体 ICU 入院率为 51.4%,与外科脓毒症相关的医院死亡率为 21.7%。与外科脓毒症相关的医院死亡率相关的因素包括年龄大于 55 岁 (p=0.034)、合并症存在 (p=0.069)、低血压 (p=0.014)、心动过速 (p=0.061)、呼吸急促 (p=0.028)、意识水平下降 (p=0.021)、GIT 穿孔存在 (p=0.026)和器官功能障碍数量 (p=0.035)。从这些因素中得出了一个包含六个参数的预测评分 (KiSS 评分),并与 qSOFA 评分进行了比较。KiSS 评分预测死亡率的敏感性为 73%(qSOFA 为 52%),特异性为 97%(qSOFA 为 87%)。通过 AUROC 曲线评估医院死亡率的预测有效性,KiSS 为 0.939(95%CI,p<0.001),qSOFA 为 0.684(95%CI,p<0.001)。
KiSS 评分可有效预测低资源环境下与外科脓毒症相关的医院死亡率。KiSS 评分显示出分层外科脓毒症患者进行手术的优势,可将患者分为预后良好、可变和不良的患者。