Suppr超能文献

前置形容词的顺序是一个非常重要的问题,因为形容词是按照可能的需求来排序的。

Prenominal adjective order is such a fat big deal because adjectives are ordered by likely need.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P220 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):122-138. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01769-w.

Abstract

When multiple adjectives precede a noun in English, they are often ordered in a way that is implicitly understood by all fluent speakers of the language. Adjective order might be described as a big fat deal, but to describe it as a fat big deal betrays a lack of knowledge of English. Sweet (A New English Grammar: Part II, 1898/1955) proposed two related semantic principles to explain the phenomenon: definiteness of denotation (adjectives that denote a property that is most independent of the modified noun must be placed furthest from that noun) and closeness of adjective/noun in meaning (adjectives that denote properties essential to or inherent in the modified noun are placed closer to the noun). These observational descriptions of the phenomenon have received experimental support (Martin, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(6), 697-704, 1969). However, the issue of why Sweet's rules are true has not yet been solved. I propose, operationalize, test, and find strong support for a simple theory: that prenominal adjective order reflects likely need, the a priori probability that a particular adjective will be needed.

摘要

当多个形容词在英文中修饰一个名词时,它们的顺序通常是所有流利的英语使用者都默认为正确的。形容词的顺序可能被描述为一个大问题,但如果将其描述为“胖大问题”,则表明对英语缺乏了解。Sweet(《新英语语法:第二部分,1898/1955》)提出了两个相关的语义原则来解释这一现象:指示的明确性(表示与修饰名词最不相关的属性的形容词必须放在离名词最远的位置)和形容词/名词意义的接近性(表示修饰名词的本质或内在属性的形容词应放在更靠近名词的位置)。这些对现象的观察性描述得到了实验的支持(Martin,《言语学习与言语行为杂志》,8(6),697-704,1969)。然而,为什么 Sweet 的规则是正确的这个问题尚未得到解决。我提出了一个简单的理论,并对其进行了操作化、测试,发现了强有力的支持:前置形容词的顺序反映了可能的需要,即某个形容词可能被需要的先验概率。

相似文献

1
Prenominal adjective order is such a fat big deal because adjectives are ordered by likely need.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):122-138. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01769-w.
2
Processing prenominal adjectives during sentence comprehension.
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):141-57. doi: 10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157.
4
Scale structure: processing minimum standard and maximum standard scalar adjectives.
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):299-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
5
Syntax, morphosyntax, and serial recall: How language supports short-term memory.
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):174-191. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01203-z. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Children's use of syntactic and pragmatic knowledge in the interpretation of novel adjectives.
Child Dev. 2006 Jan-Feb;77(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00853.x.
7
Syntactic distinctions in child language.
J Child Lang. 1990 Jun;17(2):343-55. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900013805.
8
Supporting adjective learning by children with Developmental Language Disorder: Enhancing metalinguistic approaches.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Mar;58(2):629-650. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12792. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order.
Brain Lang. 2007 Mar;100(3):238-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
10
The power of "good": Can adjectives rapidly decrease as well as increase the availability of the upcoming noun?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;48(6):856-875. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001091. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):115-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026727.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验