Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, P220 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):122-138. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01769-w.
When multiple adjectives precede a noun in English, they are often ordered in a way that is implicitly understood by all fluent speakers of the language. Adjective order might be described as a big fat deal, but to describe it as a fat big deal betrays a lack of knowledge of English. Sweet (A New English Grammar: Part II, 1898/1955) proposed two related semantic principles to explain the phenomenon: definiteness of denotation (adjectives that denote a property that is most independent of the modified noun must be placed furthest from that noun) and closeness of adjective/noun in meaning (adjectives that denote properties essential to or inherent in the modified noun are placed closer to the noun). These observational descriptions of the phenomenon have received experimental support (Martin, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(6), 697-704, 1969). However, the issue of why Sweet's rules are true has not yet been solved. I propose, operationalize, test, and find strong support for a simple theory: that prenominal adjective order reflects likely need, the a priori probability that a particular adjective will be needed.
当多个形容词在英文中修饰一个名词时,它们的顺序通常是所有流利的英语使用者都默认为正确的。形容词的顺序可能被描述为一个大问题,但如果将其描述为“胖大问题”,则表明对英语缺乏了解。Sweet(《新英语语法:第二部分,1898/1955》)提出了两个相关的语义原则来解释这一现象:指示的明确性(表示与修饰名词最不相关的属性的形容词必须放在离名词最远的位置)和形容词/名词意义的接近性(表示修饰名词的本质或内在属性的形容词应放在更靠近名词的位置)。这些对现象的观察性描述得到了实验的支持(Martin,《言语学习与言语行为杂志》,8(6),697-704,1969)。然而,为什么 Sweet 的规则是正确的这个问题尚未得到解决。我提出了一个简单的理论,并对其进行了操作化、测试,发现了强有力的支持:前置形容词的顺序反映了可能的需要,即某个形容词可能被需要的先验概率。