NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Jan;24(1):105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
We investigated the thermoregulatory responses to ice slurry ingestion during low- and moderate-intensity exercises with restrictive heat loss.
Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over design.
Following a familiarisation trial, ten physically active males exercised on a motorised treadmill at low-intensity (L; 40% VO) or moderate-intensity (M; 70% VO) for 75-min, in four randomised, counterbalanced trials. Throughout the exercise bout, participants donned a raincoat to restrict heat loss. Participants ingested 2gkg body mass of ambient water (L+AMB and M+AMB trials) or ice slurry (L+ICE and M+ICE trials) at 15-min intervals during exercise in environmental conditions of T 25.1±0.6°C and RH, 63±5%. Heart rate (HR), gastrointestinal temperature (T), mean weighted skin temperature (T), estimated sweat loss, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (RTS) were recorded.
Compared to L+AMB, participants completed L+ICE trials with lower ΔT (0.8±0.3°C vs 0.6±0.2°C; p=0.03), mean RPE (10±1 vs 9±1; p=0.03) and estimated sweat loss (0.91±0.2L vs 0.78±0.27L; p=0.04). Contrastingly, T (p=0.22), T (p=0.37), HR (p=0.31), RPE (p=0.38) and sweat loss (p=0.17) were similar between M+AMB and M+ICE trials. RTS was similar during both low-intensity (4.9±0.5 vs 4.7±0.3; p=0.10) and moderate-intensity exercise (5.3±0.47 vs 5.0±0.4; p=0.09).
Per-cooling using ice slurry ingestion marginally reduced thermal strain during low-intensity but not during moderate-intensity exercise. Ice slurry may be an effective and practical heat mitigation strategy during low-intensity exercise such as in occupational and military settings, but a greater volume should be considered to ensure its efficacy.
在限制散热的情况下,我们研究了低强度和中等强度运动中摄入冰浆对体温调节的反应。
随机、对照、交叉设计。
在一次熟悉试验后,10 名活跃的男性在电动跑步机上以低强度(L;40% VO)或中等强度(M;70% VO)运动 75 分钟,进行 4 次随机、对照的交叉试验。在整个运动过程中,参与者都穿着雨衣以限制热量损失。在环境温度为 T 25.1±0.6°C 和 RH、63±5%的情况下,参与者在 15 分钟的间隔内以 2gkg 体重的速度摄入环境水(L+AMB 和 M+AMB 试验)或冰浆(L+ICE 和 M+ICE 试验)。记录心率(HR)、胃肠温度(T)、平均加权皮肤温度(T)、估计的出汗量、感知用力程度(RPE)和热感觉(RTS)。
与 L+AMB 相比,参与者在完成 L+ICE 试验时,ΔT(0.8±0.3°C 对 0.6±0.2°C;p=0.03)、平均 RPE(10±1 对 9±1;p=0.03)和估计的出汗量(0.91±0.2L 对 0.78±0.27L;p=0.04)更低。相反,T(p=0.22)、T(p=0.37)、HR(p=0.31)、RPE(p=0.38)和出汗量(p=0.17)在 M+AMB 和 M+ICE 试验之间相似。在低强度(4.9±0.5 对 4.7±0.3;p=0.10)和中等强度运动(5.3±0.47 对 5.0±0.4;p=0.09)时,RTS 相似。
使用冰浆摄入进行冷却在低强度运动中可轻微减少热应激,但在中等强度运动中则不然。冰浆可能是职业和军事环境中低强度运动等情况下有效且实用的热缓解策略,但为确保其效果,应考虑更大的用量。