Suppr超能文献

应用 Propel 系统行微骨切开术对牙齿移动、疼痛/生活质量、支抗丧失和牙根吸收的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Post-graduation program of dentistry, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Rua Augusto Correa 01, Belém, Pará, 66075-110, Brazil.

Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém, Pará, Brazil.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2020 Jul 27;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00326-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) performed with Propel and other mini-screws on the rate of tooth movement, pain/discomfort, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and root resorption in patients undergoing orthodontic retraction compared to a control group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, LILACS, Google Scholar, Scopus, and OpenGrey were searched without restriction. A manual search was also carried out. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB 2.0 and the certainty of evidence through the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

Among the twelve RCTs reviewed, five used the Propel system. Overall, the RoB was classified as low (4), moderate (5), and high (3). Two RCTs with moderate and one with a low RoB using the Propel system reported mild increases on rate of tooth movement associated with MOPs. One RCT with a moderate and another with high RoB did not find a significant effect of Propel on orthodontic movement. Regarding tooth movement, a subgroup meta-analysis found no differences between control and Propel movement (95% CI = - 0.01 to 0.75) or other mini-screws (- 0.02 to 0.31) related to rate of tooth movement per month. There was no effect of MOPs on root resorption, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and a mild effect on pain and oral health related to quality of life regardless of mini-screw type. The level of certainty was graded as low for the rate of tooth movement and pain/discomfort, as moderate for anchorage loss, and high for root resorption.

CONCLUSION

A low certainty of evidence supports that MOPs performed with Propel seem to have no significant effect on the rate of tooth movement. Moreover, this intervention does not seem to cause an increase in root resorption, periodontal heath, pain/discomfort, or anchorage loss. Thus, the Propel system does not appear to produce different results from those observed for other mini-screws.

摘要

背景

本系统评价的目的是评估与对照组相比,使用 Prope 及其他微型种植体进行微骨切开术(MOPs)对正畸牵引患者牙齿移动速度、疼痛/不适、牙周健康、支抗丧失和牙根吸收的影响。

材料与方法

无限制地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science、LILACS、Google Scholar、Scopus 和 OpenGrey,并进行了手工检索。仅纳入随机临床试验(RCT)。使用 RoB 2.0 评估偏倚风险(RoB),使用 GRADE 工具评估证据确定性。

结果

在审查的 12 项 RCT 中,有 5 项使用了 Prope 系统。总体而言,RoB 被分类为低(4)、中(5)和高(3)。两项使用 Prope 系统的 RCT 和一项 RoB 为低的 RCT 报告称,MOPs 相关的牙齿移动速度略有增加。一项 RoB 为中、另一项 RoB 为高的 RCT 发现 Prope 对正畸移动没有显著影响。关于牙齿移动,亚组荟萃分析发现,对照组与 Prope 移动之间的差异无统计学意义(95%CI=-0.01 至 0.75)或与其他微型种植体相关的差异无统计学意义(-0.02 至 0.31)。MOPs 对牙根吸收、牙周健康、支抗丧失没有影响,对疼痛和与生活质量相关的口腔健康有轻度影响,但与微型种植体类型无关。牙齿移动速度和疼痛/不适的证据确定性等级为低,支抗丧失的证据确定性等级为中,牙根吸收的证据确定性等级为高。

结论

低确定性证据表明,使用 Prope 进行 MOPs 似乎对牙齿移动速度没有显著影响。此外,这种干预似乎不会增加牙根吸收、牙周健康、疼痛/不适或支抗丧失。因此,Prope 系统似乎不会产生与其他微型种植体观察到的不同结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b427/7383046/01abffc5cc35/40510_2020_326_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验