J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Aug;151(8):625-636.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.02.025.
The rise of direct-to-consumer (DTC) orthodontics has caused significant controversy among dentists and orthodontists. However, little is known about the actual harms or benefits experienced by users of at-home teeth aligners.
The authors designed a 24-item online survey to assess users' experiences with at-home aligners. The authors recruited users for 6 months (March-August 2019) on social media platforms (Instagram, Twitter) and online forums related to DTC orthodontics. A total of 470 responses were analyzed.
The typical respondent was a white, female millennial (23-38 years old in 2019) who purchased aligners to correct crowding. More than one-half of respondents consulted with a dentist before purchasing aligners. In those interactions, the dentist most often recommended an in-office treatment. Although most respondents (87.5%) were satisfied with DTC treatment, 6.6% had to visit their dentist due to the severity of adverse effects.
Although many respondents would have preferred traditional treatment from a dentist or orthodontist, they opted for DTC aligners because of cost and convenience.
Rather than warning patients wholesale against at-home aligners, it might be more productive for dentists to have frank discussions with them about the risks and benefits. In parallel to pushing for increased accountability, it might be prudent to consider new ways of coexisting in this altered landscape, such as offering professional oversight of DTC treatments.
直接面向消费者(DTC)的正畸治疗的兴起在牙医和正畸医生中引起了极大的争议。然而,对于使用家用牙齿矫正器的用户实际经历的危害或益处知之甚少。
作者设计了一个 24 项的在线调查,以评估用户对家用牙套的体验。作者在社交媒体平台(Instagram、Twitter)和与 DTC 正畸相关的在线论坛上招募了 6 个月(2019 年 3 月至 8 月)的用户。共分析了 470 个回复。
典型的受访者是白人,女性千禧一代(2019 年 23-38 岁),购买矫正器是为了矫正拥挤。超过一半的受访者在购买矫正器之前咨询过牙医。在这些互动中,牙医最常推荐的是办公室治疗。尽管大多数受访者(87.5%)对 DTC 治疗感到满意,但仍有 6.6%的人因不良反应严重而不得不去看牙医。
尽管许多受访者更希望接受牙医或正畸医生的传统治疗,但他们选择 DTC 矫正器是因为成本和便利性。
与其全面警告患者不要使用家用牙套,牙医不如与他们坦诚地讨论风险和益处。在推动提高问责制的同时,考虑以新的方式共存于这种变化的环境中可能是明智的,例如提供对 DTC 治疗的专业监督。