Woods Toby J, Windt Jennifer M, Carter Olivia
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 8;11:1259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01259. eCollection 2020.
Shamatha, Transcendental, and Stillness Meditation are said to aim for "contentless" experiences, where mental content such as thoughts, perceptions, and mental images is absent. Silence is understood to be a central feature of those experiences. The main source of information about the experiences is texts by experts from within the three traditions. Previous research has tended not to use an explicit scientific method for selecting and reviewing expert texts on meditation. We have identified evidence synthesis as a robust and transparent method that is suitable for this purpose. In this paper we use evidence synthesis based on expert texts to examine silence/quietness as a feature of the contentless experiences in the three practices. Objective criteria were used to select a sample of 135 expert texts. A database containing the expert descriptions of the meditation techniques and experiences was produced by extracting the relevant material from the publications and coding that material to differentiate individual features. The database, which forms part of the Supplementary Material for this paper, identifies each feature of the contentless experiences referred to in the expert texts, including silence/quietness. Our key finding is that the experts indicate silence/quietness has a particular connection with stillness, and the absence of concepts, mental activity/noise, thoughts, and disturbance. Further analysis leads to the following insights. The silence/quietness reflects the absence of thoughts and sounds, and this fits neatly with a conception of silence/quietness as the absence of internal and external noise. In some cases the terms silence and quietness may also reflect the absence of other disturbances such as non-auditory perceptions, mental images, and negative feelings. That would fit with a conception of silence/quietness as complete calm or absence of disturbance. It is not clear from the expert texts how silence/quietness is distinct from other features such as stillness that also reflect the absence of disturbances. As a separate matter, silence/quietness has connections with all the other features of the contentless experiences, but the closeness of the connections varies. Our work uncovers fine distinctions and ambiguities which lead to new research questions that can be explored in future studies.
据说,止观禅修、超验禅修和静虑禅修旨在实现“无内容”的体验,即不存在诸如思想、感知和心理意象等心理内容。寂静被认为是这些体验的核心特征。关于这些体验的主要信息来源是这三种传统内部专家撰写的文本。以往的研究往往没有采用明确的科学方法来挑选和审视关于禅修的专家文本。我们已确定证据综合法是一种适用于此目的的可靠且透明的方法。在本文中,我们运用基于专家文本的证据综合法,来考察寂静/安静作为这三种修行中无内容体验的一个特征。我们使用客观标准挑选了135篇专家文本作为样本。通过从出版物中提取相关材料并对这些材料进行编码以区分各个特征,建立了一个包含对禅修技巧和体验的专家描述的数据库。该数据库构成了本文补充材料的一部分,它识别出了专家文本中提到的无内容体验的每个特征,包括寂静/安静。我们的主要发现是,专家们指出寂静/安静与静止、不存在概念、心理活动/噪音、思想和干扰有着特定的联系。进一步分析得出以下见解。寂静/安静反映了思想和声音的缺失,这与将寂静/安静视为不存在内部和外部噪音的概念非常契合。在某些情况下,寂静和安静这两个术语也可能反映出不存在其他干扰,如非听觉感知、心理意象和负面情绪。这将与将寂静/安静视为完全平静或不存在干扰的概念相契合。从专家文本中尚不清楚寂静/安静如何与其他也反映不存在干扰的特征(如静止)区分开来。另外,寂静/安静与无内容体验的所有其他特征都有联系,但联系的紧密程度各不相同。我们的研究揭示了细微的差别和模糊之处,这些差别和模糊之处引发了新的研究问题,可供未来的研究进行探索。