Mahdipour Elahe, Sahebkar Amirhossein
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Halal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran.
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Jul 11;2020:6320514. doi: 10.1155/2020/6320514. eCollection 2020.
Recombinant proteins and growth factors are emerging therapies for diabetic foot ulcers. Despite several clinical reports, there has been no comprehensive and systematic assessment of the totality of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of recombinant proteins and growth factors in diabetic foot ulcers. We tried to address this gap through an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched, and RCTs on the efficacy of recombinant proteins and growth factors in the treatment of cutaneous wounds in diabetic patients were selected. The literature search and assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Jadad scale.
We identified 26 RCTs involving diabetic patients with ulcer that evaluated the effectiveness of platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, erythropoietin, transforming growth factor, talactoferrin, and rusalatide acetate. The main primary outcome was complete healing though different indices were employed to define this such as wound closure, granulation tissue formation, or complete reepithelialization. Few studies had a follow-up period to report any recurrence and amputation rate. No adverse effect was reported due to the intervention.
Overall, there is a greater agreement on the effectiveness of EGF to enhance the healing of diabetic ulcers. Nevertheless, extant evidence is lacking for other agents since few trials have been conducted for most of the growth factors and available studies are heterogeneous in their methodologies.
重组蛋白和生长因子正成为治疗糖尿病足溃疡的新方法。尽管有多项临床报告,但对于重组蛋白和生长因子治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效和安全性的临床证据总体情况,尚未进行全面系统的评估。我们试图通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行更新的系统评价来填补这一空白。
检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、Embase和谷歌学术数据库,并选择了关于重组蛋白和生长因子治疗糖尿病患者皮肤伤口疗效的随机对照试验。文献检索和评估由两名独立的评审员进行。使用Jadad量表评估研究的方法学质量。
我们确定了26项涉及糖尿病溃疡患者的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了血小板衍生生长因子、表皮生长因子、成纤维细胞生长因子、粒细胞集落刺激因子、血管内皮生长因子、促红细胞生成素、转化生长因子、乳铁传递蛋白和醋酸鲁拉肽的有效性。主要的主要结局是完全愈合,不过使用了不同的指标来定义这一结局,如伤口闭合、肉芽组织形成或完全上皮再生。很少有研究有随访期来报告任何复发率和截肢率。未报告因干预导致的不良反应。
总体而言,对于表皮生长因子促进糖尿病溃疡愈合的有效性存在更大的共识。然而,对于其他药物,现有证据不足,因为大多数生长因子的试验很少,且现有研究在方法上存在异质性。