Animal Care Services, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;, Email:
Animal Care Services, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020 Sep 1;59(5):531-538. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000161. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Due to their unpredictability and variable effects, injectable anesthetic regimens in laboratory rodent species warrant refinement. In our study we sought to evaluate alfaxalone, which has gained recent popularity in veterinary medicine, alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine to evaluate their anesthetic ability in Sprague-Dawley rats when administered intraperitoneally. Three doses of alfaxalone only and 4 dose combinations of alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine were tested in males and female rats. The time to induction, anesthetic duration, pulse rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and time to recovery were recorded by a blind observer. The level of anesthesia induced by the various anesthetic protocols was assessed by using pedal withdrawal reflex to a noxious stimulus and scored according to the response. Dependent on the treatment group, atipamezole or saline was administered intraperitoneally once animals reached 60 min of anesthesia. Regardless of the dose, alfaxalone alone achieved only a sedative level of anesthesia, whereas all alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine combinations led to a surgical level of anesthesia in all animals. Anesthesia regimens using alfaxalone alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine demonstrated sex-associated differences, with female rats maintaining longer durations of sedation or anesthesia than their male counterparts. Both male and female rats displayed decreases in physiologic parameters consistent with the effects of dexmedetomidine. Given the results described herein, we recommend 20 mg/kg alfaxalone for sedation and 30 mg/kg alfaxalone combined with 0.05 mg/kg dexmedetomidine for surgical anesthesia in female rats. Appropriate doses of alfaxalone only and alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine for male rats were not determined in this study and need further evaluation.
由于其不可预测性和可变作用,实验室啮齿动物物种的注射麻醉方案需要改进。在我们的研究中,我们试图评估阿尔法酮,它在兽医医学中最近很受欢迎,单独使用和与右美托咪定联合使用,以评估其在雄性和雌性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠中经腹腔给药时的麻醉能力。仅测试了三种剂量的阿尔法酮和 4 种剂量的阿尔法酮-右美托咪定组合。由盲法观察者记录诱导时间、麻醉持续时间、脉搏率、呼吸率、体温和恢复时间。通过对有害刺激的足部退缩反射来评估各种麻醉方案诱导的麻醉水平,并根据反应进行评分。根据治疗组,一旦动物达到 60 分钟的麻醉,通过腹腔内给予阿替美唑或生理盐水。无论剂量如何,单独使用阿尔法酮仅达到镇静水平的麻醉,而所有阿尔法酮-右美托咪定组合都导致所有动物达到手术水平的麻醉。单独使用阿尔法酮和联合使用右美托咪定的麻醉方案显示出与性别相关的差异,雌性大鼠的镇静或麻醉持续时间比雄性大鼠长。雄性和雌性大鼠的生理参数均下降,与右美托咪定的作用一致。鉴于本文所述的结果,我们建议 20mg/kg 阿尔法酮用于镇静,30mg/kg 阿尔法酮联合 0.05mg/kg 右美托咪定用于雌性大鼠的手术麻醉。在这项研究中,未确定雄性大鼠中适当剂量的阿尔法酮单独使用和阿尔法酮-右美托咪定,需要进一步评估。