Evanoff Bradley A, Strickland Jaime R, Dale Ann Marie, Hayibor Lisa, Page Emily, Duncan Jennifer G, Kannampallil Thomas, Gray Diana L
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Healthier Workforce Center of the Midwest, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e21366. doi: 10.2196/21366.
The response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has created an unprecedented disruption in work conditions. This study describes the mental health and well-being of workers both with and without clinical exposure to patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression, work exhaustion, burnout, and decreased well-being among faculty and staff at a university and academic medical center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and describe work-related and personal factors associated with their mental health and well-being.
All faculty, staff, and postdoctoral fellows of a university, including its medical school, were invited in April 2020 to complete an online questionnaire measuring stress, anxiety, depression, work exhaustion, burnout, and decreased well-being. We examined associations between these outcomes and factors including work in high-risk clinical settings and family/home stressors.
There were 5550 respondents (overall response rate of 34.3%). Overall, 34% of faculty and 14% of staff (n=915) were providing clinical care, while 61% of faculty and 77% of staff were working from home. Among all workers, anxiety (prevalence ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.73), depression (prevalence ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.59), and high work exhaustion (prevalence ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.13-1.36) were independently associated with community or clinical exposure to COVID-19. Poor family-supportive behaviors by supervisors were also associated with these outcomes (prevalence ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.62; prevalence ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.48-1.92; and prevalence ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.44-1.64, respectively). Age <40 years and a greater number of family/home stressors were also associated with these poorer outcomes. Among the subset of clinicians, caring for patients with COVID-19 and working in high-risk clinical settings were additional risk factors.
Our findings suggest that the pandemic has had negative effects on the mental health and well-being of both clinical and nonclinical employees. Mitigating exposure to COVID-19 and increasing supervisor support are modifiable risk factors that may protect mental health and well-being for all workers.
对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行的应对给工作条件带来了前所未有的破坏。本研究描述了有和没有临床接触冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的工作人员的心理健康和幸福感。
本研究的目的是测量在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,一所大学及学术医疗中心的教职员工中压力、焦虑、抑郁、工作倦怠、职业倦怠和幸福感下降的患病率,并描述与其心理健康和幸福感相关的工作相关因素和个人因素。
2020年4月,一所大学(包括其医学院)的所有教职员工和博士后研究员被邀请完成一份在线问卷,该问卷测量压力、焦虑、抑郁、工作倦怠、职业倦怠和幸福感下降情况。我们研究了这些结果与包括在高风险临床环境中工作和家庭/家庭压力源等因素之间的关联。
共有5550名受访者(总回复率为34.3%)。总体而言,34%的教职员工和14%的工作人员(n = 915)提供临床护理,而61%的教职员工和77%的工作人员在家工作。在所有工作人员中,焦虑(患病率比1.37,95%可信区间1.09 - 1.73)、抑郁(患病率比1.28,95%可信区间1.03 - 1.59)和高工作倦怠(患病率比1.24,95%可信区间1.13 - 1.36)与社区或临床接触COVID-19独立相关。上级缺乏家庭支持行为也与这些结果相关(患病率比分别为1.40,95%可信区间1.21 - 1.62;患病率比1.69,95%可信区间1.48 - 1.92;患病率比1.54,95%可信区间1.44 - 1.64)。年龄<40岁和更多的家庭/家庭压力源也与这些较差的结果相关。在临床医生子集中,照顾COVID-19患者和在高风险临床环境中工作是额外的风险因素。
我们的研究结果表明,大流行对临床和非临床员工的心理健康和幸福感都产生了负面影响。减少接触COVID-19和增加上级支持是可改变的风险因素,可能保护所有工作人员的心理健康和幸福感。