Department of Medicine, Colton Center for Autoimmunity, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1384. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01384. eCollection 2020.
Previously, we demonstrated in test and validation cohorts that type I IFN (T1IFN) activity can predict non-response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we examine the biology of non-classical and classical monocytes from RA patients defined by their pre-biologic treatment T1IFN activity. We compared single cell gene expression in purified classical (CL, = 342) and non-classical (NC, = 359) monocytes. In our previous work, RA patients who had either high IFNβ/α activity (>1.3) or undetectable T1IFN were likely to have EULAR non-response to TNFi. In this study comparisons were made among patients grouped according to their pre-biologic treatment T1IFN activity as clinically relevant: "T1IFN undetectable (T1IFN ND) or IFNβ/α >1.3" ( = 9) and "T1IFN detectable but IFNβ/α ≤ 1.3" ( = 6). In addition, comparisons were made among patients grouped according to their T1IFN activity itself: "T1IFN ND," "T1IFN detected and IFNβ/α ≤ 1.3," and "IFNβ/α >1.3." Major differences in gene expression were apparent in principal component and unsupervised cluster analyses. CL monocytes from the T1IFN ND or IFNβ/α >1.3 group were unlikely to express and ( < 0.0001 and 0.0005, respectively). In NC monocytes from the same group, expression of ( ≤ 0.0001 for each) and others was enriched. Interestingly, expression was absent in CL and NC monocytes from nine patients. This pattern most strongly associated with the IFNβ/α>1.3 group. Differences in gene expression in monocytes among the groups suggest differential IFN pathway activation in RA patients who are either likely to respond or to have no response to TNFi. Additional transcripts enriched in NC cells of those in the T1IFN ND and IFNβ/α >1.3 groups included MYD88, CD86, IRF1, and IL8. This work could suggest key pathways active in biologically defined groups of patients, and potential therapeutic strategies for those patients unlikely to respond to TNFi.
先前,我们在测试和验证队列中证明,I 型干扰素(T1IFN)活性可预测类风湿关节炎(RA)患者对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的无应答。在这项研究中,我们检查了在生物学治疗前 T1IFN 活性定义的 RA 患者的非经典和经典单核细胞的生物学特性。我们比较了纯化的经典(CL,n=342)和非经典(NC,n=359)单核细胞的单细胞基因表达。在我们之前的工作中,IFNβ/α 活性较高(>1.3)或 T1IFN 无法检测到的 RA 患者很可能对 TNFi 无反应。在这项研究中,根据他们在生物学治疗前 T1IFN 活性进行分组比较,这些分组与临床相关:“T1IFN 无法检测到(T1IFN ND)或 IFNβ/α >1.3”(n=9)和“T1IFN 可检测到但 IFNβ/α ≤ 1.3”(n=6)。此外,根据他们的 T1IFN 活性本身进行了分组比较:“T1IFN ND”、“T1IFN 检测到且 IFNβ/α ≤ 1.3”和“IFNβ/α >1.3”。在主成分和无监督聚类分析中,明显存在基因表达的主要差异。来自 T1IFN ND 或 IFNβ/α >1.3 组的 CL 单核细胞不太可能表达 (<0.0001 和 0.0005,分别)。在同一组的 NC 单核细胞中, (对于每个都≤0.0001)和其他的表达丰富。有趣的是,九个患者的 CL 和 NC 单核细胞中均不存在 表达。这种模式与 IFNβ/α>1.3 组最强相关。在各组之间单核细胞中的基因表达差异表明,在 TNFi 可能有反应或无反应的 RA 患者中,IFN 途径的激活存在差异。在 T1IFN ND 和 IFNβ/α >1.3 组的 NC 细胞中富集的其他转录物包括 MYD88、CD86、IRF1 和 IL8。这项工作可能表明在生物学上定义的患者群体中活跃的关键途径,并为那些对 TNFi 反应不佳的患者提供潜在的治疗策略。