Federal University of Santa Catarina, Department of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Florianópolis, SC 88040-900, Brazil.
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Department of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Florianópolis, SC 88040-900, Brazil.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141087. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141087. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
The objective of this work is to present and to apply a method to environmentally evaluate a permeable pavement system used to harvest stormwater for non-potable water uses in a building. Two pavement systems were compared through life cycle assessment (LCA). The first system consists of a permeable pavement; in this case, the stormwater filtered by the pavement is used for non-potable water purposes in a building. The second system consists of a flexible pavement (impermeable), with no stormwater harvesting, and with conventional water supply in the building. The method was applied in a case study in a public building in southern Brazil. Water consumption surveys were made and the potential for potable water and electricity savings in the building were estimated. In the inventory, input and output data related to each stage of the life cycle of the systems were gathered and quantified. In the impact assessment, it was found that, for both pavement systems, the most significant damages were related to the implementation and end-of-life stages. The permeable pavement system presented a lower potential for environmental impacts in most midpoint categories evaluated, and also lower overall potential impact in the endpoint approach. The results also showed that the categories with the greatest environmental impact for both systems were fine particulate matter formation and global warming. The method proposed can be used as a basis for guiding planning and decision-making to improve water infrastructure management through stormwater harvesting in urban centres.
本工作旨在提出并应用一种方法,以环境评估用于在建筑物中收集雨水以用于非饮用水用途的透水铺面系统。通过生命周期评估(LCA)比较了两种铺面系统。第一个系统由透水铺面组成;在这种情况下,通过铺面过滤的雨水用于建筑物中的非饮用水用途。第二个系统由柔性铺面(不透水)组成,没有雨水收集,建筑物中的常规供水。该方法应用于巴西南部一座公共建筑的案例研究。进行了用水调查,并估计了建筑物中饮用水和电力节约的潜力。在清单中,收集并量化了与系统生命周期各个阶段相关的投入和产出数据。在影响评估中发现,对于这两种铺面系统,最显著的损害都与实施和使用寿命结束阶段有关。透水铺面系统在大多数评估的中点类别中表现出较低的环境影响潜力,并且在终点方法中也具有较低的总体潜在影响。结果还表明,对于这两个系统,对环境影响最大的类别是细颗粒物形成和全球变暖。所提出的方法可作为指导规划和决策的基础,通过在城市中心收集雨水来改善水基础设施管理。